if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite.

If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio that has been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite.

If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio that has been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite.

If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio that has been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite.

If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio that has been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite. If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio that has been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). This has been done to facilitate a transfer of wealth to the elite. If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably largely because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio they have been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).

An important note to those values is no matter how you adjust gold, up until 1800 (and more egregiously, post 1873) the gold:silver value ratio was 10:1 for all of history (with minor variance). This is probably largely because that is almost exactly the same as the ratio they have been mined. Now that silver is in much higher demand than gold in the technology market, it may be worth even more (relative to gold) when this all settles.

if they really allowed it to float, we'd be looking at 3k an ounce for Au; 60-65 for Ag

I don't think you understand how long this has been going on, nor why. They have been manipulating the metals, silver especially, since the first London bank was put in America (around 1810). If they lose control of it, it will adjust to its real value. If you look at gold/silver purchasing power for the 4000ish years prior to 1800, their real purchase power adjusted value is around 10k/oz for Au, and 1k/oz for Ag in todays market (e.g. buying a house, groceries, tools, etc.).