She did not say no reasonable person would believe her. She said they wouldn't take it as a statement of fact. As in - she isn't the expert, she was presenting information from witnesses. While she also says she believes it to be true, she also says it needed to be tested in the courts before being taken as truth.

What a good reminder for everyone. I'm looking at you, rioters.

If they hold her responsible for what she cites from sources, then what sort of accountability might that give to politicians and pundits who breathlessly repeat as fact what they hear from sources?

She did not say no reasonable person would believe her. She said they wouldn't take it as a statement of fact. As in - she isn't the expert, she was presenting information from witnesses. While she also says she believes it to be true, she also says it needed to be tested in the courts before being taken as truth.

What a good reminder for everyone. I'm looking at you, rioters.

If they hold her responsible for what she cites from sources what sort of accountability might that give to politicians and pundits who breathlessly repeat as fact what they hear from sources?