I’m curious as to why you posit that D’Souza’s book doesn’t contain any truth.

That is not what I said at all, nor did I mean to imply that. My implication was that the truth is unknowable, especially regarding a person who's past has purposefully been made unknowable by those with the power to do so.

An additional implication was that even sources that are generally good can be controlled opposition. Many of those that I liked as sources before have turned out to be very likely controlled opposition on closer inspection.

In no way am I making a statement to either of those implications. I'm not even saying I think that. I am only suggesting that the truth is likely much more complicated than you or I or D'Souza know, or that you can read in a book that was published at a time when printing the whole truth would have been an instant death sentence (and never would have been published).

And if you can at some point, would you provide some factual reference material for your assertions?

I made the assertions with the statement that I was going off of memory and had no resources on hand. I then followed up with the implication that I did not know his true history. I did not say those things without reason. On the contrary, I made them explicitly because I know how important resources are, and how overall useless baseless claims are. I only wanted to draw attention to putting too much faith in one persons take on things, given that we are in an information war.

On a quick search I can find such claims, but nothing really good, and I am too busy with other things to dig deeper right now. This memory of mine comes from months ago when I was doing research on this. At that time I was still new to this whole thing and was not yet saving links.

Regardless, I think it is likely, given the direct ties between Soetoro and Saudi funding for his college and campaigns, and pictures from Q of him as a child with what appears to be Muslim extremists in training, that this line of reasoning may have some basis.

In addition, there is substantial evidence that those that are raised for some purpose (such as becoming an A-list actor, or globalist, or president) are indoctrinated from childhood using both rape and ritualistic murder as forms of breaking the mind for Satanist programming. I think it would be intellectually irresponsible to not entertain the idea that Barry endured this indoctrination, regardless of where he was raised and by whom, given the circumstantial evidence and ultimate results.

I’m curious as to why you posit that D’Souza’s book doesn’t contain any truth.

That is not what I said at all, nor did I mean to imply that. My implication was that the truth is unknowable, especially regarding a person who's past has purposefully been made unknowable by those with the power to do so.

An additional implication was that even sources that are generally good can be controlled opposition. Many of those that I liked as sources before have turned out to be very likely controlled opposition on closer inspection.

In no way am I making a statement to either of those implications. I'm not even saying I think that. I am only suggesting that the truth is likely much more complicated than you or I or D'Souza know, or that you can read in a book that was published at a time when printing the whole truth would have been an instant death sentence (and never would have been published).

And if you can at some point, would you provide some factual reference material for your assertions?

I made the assertions with the statement that I was going off of memory and had no resources on hand. I then followed up with the implication that I did not know his true history. I did not say those things without reason. On the contrary, I made them explicitly because I know how important resources are, and how overall useless baseless claims are. I only wanted to draw attention to putting too much faith in one persons take on things, given that we are in an information war.

On a quick search I can find such claims, but nothing really good, and I am too busy with other things to dig deeper right now. This memory of mine comes from months ago when I was doing research on this. At that time I was still new to this whole thing and was not yet saving links.

Regardless, I think it is likely, given the direct ties between Soetoro and Saudi funding for his college and campaigns, and pictures from Q of him as a child with what appears to be Muslim extremists in training, that this line of reasoning may have some basis.

In addition, there is substantial evidence that those that are raised for some purpose (such as becoming an A-list actor, or globalist, or president) are indoctrinated from childhood using both rape and ritualistic murder as forms of breaking the mind for Satanist programming. I think it would be intellectually irresponsible to not entertain the idea that Barry endured this indoctrination, regardless of where he was raised and by whom, given the circumstantial evidence and ultimate results.

I’m curious as to why you posit that D’Souza’s book doesn’t contain any truth.

That is not what I said at all, nor did I mean to imply that. My implication was that the truth is unknowable, especially regarding a person who's past has purposefully been made unknowable by those with the power to do so.

An additional implication was that even sources that are generally good can be controlled opposition. Many of those that I liked as sources before have turned out to be very likely controlled opposition on closer inspection.

In no way am I making a statement to either of those implications. I'm not even saying I think that. I am only suggesting that the truth is likely much more complicated than you or I or D'Souza know, or that you can read in a book that was published at a time when printing the whole truth would have been an instant death sentence (and never would have been published).

And if you can at some point, would you provide some factual reference material for your assertions?

I made the assertions with the statement that I was going off of memory and had no resources on hand. I then followed up with the implication that I did not know his true history. I did not say those things without reason. On the contrary, I made them explicitly because I know how important resources are, and how overall useless baseless claims are. I only wanted to draw attention to putting too much faith in one persons take on things, given that we are in an information war.

On a quick search I can find such claims, but nothing really good, and I am too busy with other things to dig deeper right now. This memory of mine comes from months ago when I was doing research on this. At that time I was still new to this whole thing and was not yet saving links.

Regardless, I think it is likely, given the direct ties between Soetoro and Saudi funding for his college and campaigns, and pictures from Q of him as a child with what appears to be Muslim extremists in training, that this line of reasoning may have some basis.

In addition, there is substantial evidence that those that are raised for some purpose (such as becoming an A-list actor, or globalist, or president) are indoctrinated from childhood using both rape and ritualistic murder as forms of breaking the mind for Satanist programming. I think it would be intellectually irresponsible to not entertain the idea that Barry endured this indoctrination, regardless of where he was raised and by whom, given the circumstantial evidence and ultimate results.

I’m curious as to why you posit that D’Souza’s book doesn’t contain any truth.

That is not what I said at all, nor did I mean to imply that. My implication was that the truth is unknowable, especially regarding a person who's past has purposefully been made unknowable by those with the power to do so.

An additional implication was that even sources that are generally good can be controlled opposition. Many of those that I liked as sources before have turned out to be very likely controlled opposition on closer inspection.

In no way am I making a statement to either of those implications. I'm not even saying I think that. I am only suggesting that the truth is likely much more complicated than you or I or D'Souza know, or that you can read in a book that was published at a time when printing the whole truth would have been an instant death sentence (and never would have been published).

And if you can at some point, would you provide some factual reference material for your assertions?

I made the assertions with the statement that I was going off of memory and had no resources on hand. I then followed up with the implication that I did not know his true history. I did not say those things without reason. On the contrary, I made them explicitly because I know how important resources are, and how overall useless baseless claims are. I only wanted to draw attention to putting too much faith in one persons take on things, given that we are in an information war.

On a quick search I can find such claims, but nothing really good, and I am too busy with other things to dig deeper right now. This memory of mine comes from months ago when I was doing research on this. At that time I was still new to this whole thing and was not yet saving links.

Regardless, I think it is likely, given the direct ties between Soetoro and Saudi funding for his college and campaigns, and pictures from Q of him as a child with what appears to be Muslim extremists in training, that this line of reasoning may have some basis.

In addition, there is substantial evidence that those that are raised for some purpose (such as becoming an A-list actor, or globalist, or president) are indoctrinated from childhood using both rape and ritualistic murder as forms of breaking the mind for Satanist programming. I think it would be disingenuous to not entertain the idea that Barry endured this indoctrination, regardless of where he was raised and by whom, given the circumstantial evidence and ultimate results.

I’m curious as to why you posit that D’Souza’s book doesn’t contain any truth.

That is not what I said at all, nor did I mean to imply that. My implication was that the truth is unknowable, especially regarding a person who's past has purposefully been made unknowable by those with the power to do so.

An additional implication was that even sources that are generally good can be controlled opposition. Many of those that I liked as sources before have turned out to be very likely controlled opposition on closer inspection.

In no way am I making a statement to either of those implications. I'm not even saying I think that. I am only suggesting that the truth is likely much more complicated than you or I or D'Souza know, or that you can read in a book that was published at a time when printing the whole truth would have been an instant death sentence (and never would have been published).

And if you can at some point, would you provide some factual reference material for your assertions?

I made the assertions with the statement that I was going off of memory and had no resources on hand. I then followed up with the implication that I did not know his true history. I did not say those things without reason. On the contrary, I made them explicitly because I know how important resources are, and how overall useless baseless claims are. I only wanted to draw attention to putting too much faith in one persons take on things, given that we are in an information war.

On a quick search I can find such claims, but nothing really good, and I am too busy with other things to dig deeper right now. This memory of mine comes from months ago when I was doing research on this. At that time I was still new to this whole thing and was not yet saving links.

Regardless, I think it is likely, given the direct ties between Soetoro and Saudi funding for his college and campaigns, and pictures from Q of him as a child with what appears to be Muslim extremists in training, that this line of reasoning may have some basis.

In addition, there is substantial evidence that those that are raised for some purpose (such as becoming an A-list actor, or globalist, or president) are indoctrinated from childhood using both rape and ritualistic murder as forms of breaking the mind for Satanist programming. I think it would be disingenuous to not entertain the idea that Barry endured this indoctrination, regardless of where he was raised and by whom, given the circumstantial evidence and ultimate results.