Uhmm, you’re attacking the wrong person. Read the first sentence that I rewrote.

The grammar is a little off but what I was trying to say is that harvesting blood from children is slightly less horrible then cutting open their brains and eating a pineal gland or drinking their blood. So harvesting blood is a horrible thing.

The reason I am cautious about adrenochrome narrative is that it is possible that the adrenochrome narrative could be a disinformation campaign meant to distract people from any story of elites and their abuse of children.

Someone with a lot of money paid for a bunch of flat earth YouTube videos starting around 2015. That was done in order to discredit all other conspiracy theories. So the flat earth narrative was a planted story paid for by someone who wants to discredit conspiracy theories or give Normies ammunition to attack people who discuss any conspiracy.

When the very first thing you tell grandma about the sense of the global elites is related to Adrenochrome, grandma is going to stop listening to you.

Now if you show grandma an article about how some men were trying to solicit sex from underage prostitutes at the Super Bowl, she might start listening to you about the crimes of global elites relating to sex trafficking.

Even if the adrenochrome story is a real thing, it is the least common form of abuse committed by globalists. The number one form of abuse would be child sexual trafficking and rape, number two is likely forced blood harvesting of youthful blood and finally number three and least frequent would be the occasional child sacrifice and the symbolic or actual consumption of their blood or brain.

All three of these things are terrible but sex trafficking affects the most children.

Now here’s the great thing if we were able to save all the children being sex trafficked, that would probably mean would also be saving a subset of kids who are being forced to be blood donors and finally some of those blood donors would have ended up being child sacrifice murder victims. Instead, all of them would be saved.

Have I made myself clear or will you continue attacking people here on the Donald.

No you’re attacking the wrong person. Read the first sentence that I wrote again.

The grammar is a little off but what I was trying to say is that Harvesting blood from children is slightly less horrible then cutting open their brain and eating at pineal gland