If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination, aka shooting yourself in the foot. As a lawyer he should know better.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya as he claimed. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was so high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of fabricated leaks via the FBINYTimes.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear (I assume) about some former lady friend of Gaetz (who may or may not have been underage).
If he's actually a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination, aka shooting yourself in the foot.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of fabricated leaks via the FBINYTimes.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of fabricated leaks via the FBINYTimes.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guilty. Why shoot yourself in the foot?
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of leaks.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guility. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of leaks.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it make make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of leaks.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it make make you sound guilty. It's an indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was had a high profile and was very vocal against the intel community. If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man. I thought he had a bright future tho he was kinda weird sometimes.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it make make you sound guilty. It's an indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man. I thought he had a bright future tho he was kinda weird sometimes.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it make make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record and self-incriminate because it make make you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record and self-incriminate because it make make you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record and self-incriminate because it make make you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record and self-incriminate because it make make you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community).
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail that he didn't need to get into and self-incriminate because it makes you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile (especially against the intel community).
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth.
If he's a pedo then feels bad man.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail that he didn't need to get into and self-incriminate because it makes you sound guilty.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be a deep state dezinformatsiya. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was high profile.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth. If he's a pedo then feels bad man.