I hear your point. It'd be interesting to see how many people the vaccine is killing. We may not know this number for years because we don't know if the vaccine weakens our immune system across the board. Or if it has other genetic complications.

As to the unasked question, the one about survival rate of covid19 after the vaccine, proponents of the vaccine would not say they are trying to boost the survival rate, but trying to suppress the infection rate. So, apples and oranges as to that question, which I know you weren't asking.

The better argument we should stick to is the one you asked, put another way: why would I take an untested vaccine with unknown life-altering side effects when getting covid19 would give me lifetime antibodies with a chance of death that is perhaps nonexistent and is no worse than 0.03%?

I hear your point. It'd be interesting to see how many people the vaccine is killing. We may not know this number for years because we don't know if the vaccine weakens our immune system across the board. Or if it has other genetic complications.

As to the unasked question, the one about survival rate of covid19 after the vaccine, proponents of the vaccine would not say they are trying to boost the survival rate, but trying to suppress the infection rate. So, apples and oranges as to that question, which I know you weren't asking.

The better argument we should stick to is the one you asked, put another way: why would I take an untested vaccine with unknown life-altering side effects when getting covid19 would give me lifetime antibodies with a chance of death that is better than 0.03%?

Proponents of the vaccine would not say they are trying to boost the survival rate, but trying to suppress the infection rate. So, apples and oranges.

The better argument we should be making is this one: why would I take an untested vaccine with unknown life-altering side effects when getting covid19 would give me lifetime antibodies with a chance of death that is better than 0.03%?