I'm confused. If we want to restore the rule of law we have to abide by the guidlines of the founders and not play by the same rules they are playing rules for thee but not for me? The only laws that should he law is any action someone intentionally acted on that caused an unfair advantage or threatened any one of the god given rights of another person. So I get where you are coming from but we need to stay balanced and not go off far right like the far left has done. We have to follow the rule of law even when we dont like the outcome. We can understand some "criminals" did not earn their consequence but we cant be ignorant to the fact some people do earn the loss of some rights established by the founders. When im talking rule of law im talking constituion. Freedom of the state you choose, well you choose to be there and they had a list of rules for their state with their consequences. Some criminals choose to disrespect those state laws. When they hide it that means they were doing something deceitful. If they did the crime loud and proud that means they were making a point to make a revolutionary point. Actions mean everything. I dont agree with all of the laws each state individually choose on but I agree 100% with the bill of rights and all the guidelines that come with how to preserve it. Just saying.

I'm confused. If we want to restore the rule of law we have to abide by the guidlines of the founders and not play by the same rules they are playing rules for thee but not for me? The only laws that should he law is any action someone intentionally acted on that caused an unfair advantage or threatened any one of the god given rights of another person. So I get where you are coming from but we need to stay balanced and not go off far right like the far left has done. We have to follow the rule of law even when we dont like the outcome. We can understand some "criminals" did not earn their consequence but we cant be ignorant to the fact some people do earn the loss of some rights established by the founders. When im talking rule of law im talking constituion. Freedom of the state you choose, well you choose to be there and they had a list of rules for their state with their consequences. Some criminals choose to disrespect those state laws. When they hide it that means they were doing something deceitful. If they did the crime loud and proud that means they were making a point to make a revolutionary point. Actions mean everything. I dont agree with all of the laws each state individually choose on but I agree 100% with the bill of rights. Just saying.

I'm confused. If we want to restore the rule of law we have to abide by the guidlines of the founders and not play by the same rules they are playing rules for thee but not for me? The only laws that should he law is any action someone intentionally acted on that caused an unfair advantage or threatened any one of the god given rights of another person. So I get where you are coming from but we need to stay balanced and not go off far right like the far left has done. We have to follow the rule of law even when we dont like the outcome. We can understand some "criminals" did not earn their consequence but we cant be ignorant to the fact some people do earn the loss of some rights established by the founders. When im talking rule of law im talking constituion. Freedom of the state you choose, well you choose to be there and they had a list of rules for their state with their consequences. I dont agree with all of the laws but I agree 100% with the bill of rights. Just saying.