I don't understand why you think that 95% of 'vaccine' recipients will be "fine after the end of the initial reaction."

My understanding is that prior attempts to create a mRNA vaccine against SARS-CV-1 (which is 80% identical to the current one, SARS-CV-2) had to be stopped when ALL the animals in the study died. NOT after the initial reaction, but later, when they were infected by coronavirus in the wild.

Given that there have been no long-term human studies or any published animal trials of the current mRNA shots being administered, I don't see how anybody can assure people that these shots are safe. We don't know the long-term effects, and therefore we have no way of knowing that the current shots will not have the same affect as the mRNA shots given to ferrets in the SARS-CV-1 study i.e., all of them died.

You say that "animal trials on this vaccine that have medium-long term effects" (I'm not aware that there are any such trials on the current shots; only on the SARS-CV-1 shots) "is a great argument to opt out of this vaccine." I would say that is putting it mildly, and I don't see where in the available data you find a basis for saying that 95% of people who get the shot will be okay after the initial effects.

We simply don't know what the long-term effects of the mRNA shots will be, and given the outcome of the SARS-CV-1 trials on animals, there is no basis confidence that similar results won't happen with the SARS-CV-2 shots. Remember, mRNA vaccines have never been tried on humans before. The people getting the shots now are the guinea pigs for the long-term trials.

I don't understand why you think that 95% of 'vaccine' recipients will be "fine after the end of the initial reaction."

My understanding is that prior attempts to create a mRNA vaccine against SARS-CV-1 (which is 80% identical to the current one, SARS-CV-2) had to be stopped when ALL the animals in the study died. NOT after the initial reaction, but later, when they were infected by coronavirus in the wild.

Given that there have been no long-term human studies or any published animal trials of the current mRNA shots being administered, I don't see how anybody can assure people that these shots are safe. We don't know the long-term effects, and therefore we have no way of knowing that the current shots will not have the same affect as the mRNA shots given to ferrets in the SARS-CV-1 study i.e., all of them died.

You say that "animal trials on this vaccine that have medium-long term effects" (I'm not aware that there are any such trials on the current shots; only on the SARS-CV-1 shots) "is a great argument to opt out of this vaccine." I would say that is putting it mildly, and I don't see where in the available data you find a basis for saying that 95% of people who get the shot will be okay after the initial effects.