Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Are you suggesting coronavirus symptoms are actually 5g?

5g may or may not be dangerous as implemented. Each wavelength of light has different interactions with the molecules of the body. In the case of 4g or 5g those interactions are minimal. These wavelengths only cause a very small vibration. They have zero capacity to ionize any molecules (insufficient energy to be absorbed, i.e. kick an electron into a higher orbit and/or cause a bond to break).

Any lower frequency is the same (radio, etc.). There just isn't enough energy to do anything but cause a very small vibration. 5g has a slightly more effect than 4g, though it is the same effect. This vibration is really just heat, or energy added to the system. It can do something, but its not much, and its not generally harmful. Indeed our bodies are being bombarded by such photons constantly, even in a completely preindustrial world (from the sun/universe in general).

5g needs to be tested more for sure. It may cause problems on human health. It may not. There is nothing wrong with the 5g frequency on the body (like I said, we get hit with them all the time and have for all of our lives, all life for all of time in fact). There may however be a problem with the intensity (photons per second) of the current implementation of 5g. I only say that because it has not be tested enough, not because I think it is likely to be true.

But to suggest that 5g is a more likely culprit than a virus we know existed in another form (SARS-cov-1) and has many other similar viral brethren is kinda ridiculous without really, really good evidence. Having a great deal of knowledge about both viruses and photons, and having looked extensively, I have found no credible evidence for such an idea.

That doesn't mean I would ignore any evidence anyone has to provide though. I am only armed with better knowledge, and better capability from that knowledge to dismiss crap. That doesn't make me infallible or all knowing (far from it on both counts).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Are you suggesting coronavirus symptoms are actually 5g?

5g may or may not be dangerous as implemented. Each wavelength of light has different interactions with the molecules of the body. In the case of 4g or 5g those interactions are minimal. These wavelengths only cause a very small vibration. They have zero capacity to ionize any molecules (insufficient energy to be absorbed, i.e. kick an electron into a higher orbit and/or cause a bond to break).

Any lower frequency is the same (radio, etc.). There just isn't enough energy to do anything but cause a very small vibration. 5g has a slightly more effect than 4g, though it is the same effect. This vibration is really just heat, or energy added to the system. It can do something, but its not much, and its not generally harmful. Indeed our bodies are being bombarded by such photons constantly, even in a completely preindustrial world (from the sun/universe in general).

Having said that, 5g is slightly more energy per photon than 4g, and is at a higher intensity (which means more photons per second). It is this second effect which is more likely to be problematic (if it is problematic at all), not the 5g frequency itself.

5g needs to be tested more for sure. It may cause problems on human health. It may not. There is nothing wrong with the 5g frequency on the body (like I said, we get hit with them all the time and have for all of our lives, all life for all of time in fact). There may however be a problem with the intensity of the current implementation of 5g. I only say that because it has not be tested enough, not because I think it is likely to be true.

But to suggest that 5g is a more likely culprit than a virus we know existed in another form (SARS-cov-1) and has many other similar viral brethren is kinda ridiculous without really, really good evidence. Having a great deal of knowledge about both viruses and photons, and having looked extensively, I have found no credible evidence for such an idea.

That doesn't mean I would ignore any evidence anyone has to provide though. I am only armed with better knowledge, and better capability from that knowledge to dismiss crap. That doesn't make me infallible or all knowing (far from it on both counts).

3 years ago
1 score