None of the jabs are FDA approved vaccines. They are under Emergency Use Authorization only. The public is part of phase 4 FDA testing of these medical devices for final FDA approval. The earliest the studies are set to conclude is fall of next year. It could be several years before all the data is then analyzed and final FDA approval is sought. With complete immunity for financial liability - pun intended - why would these manufacturers be in any hurry to seek final approval? They are in a complete win win situation here. All profit and no liability.

The public is being used in the largest study ever conducted in order to evaluate these jabs. Not only is the study unprecedented, but the technology being utilized has never been used on human subjects before - ever. All of the previous animal studies done in an attempt to develop a coronavirus vaccine proved disasterous. This is why the normal animal testing used for Emergency Use Authorization was bypassed under the protection of Warp Speed. The jabs were then rushed to production and forced onto the public by coercive means and propaganda. The public is not being truly informed of the risks and theoretical benefits of this experimentation.

Here is the bottom line. The key to refusal lies within informed consent. Laws governing informed consent are contained in the framework of the Nuremberg Code which later became codified within US's own laws on informed consent. Most people are not even being given written informed consent forms. Why? The drug manufacturers cannot give the FDA guidance for this information because at this point it is only theoretical computer modeling. There cannot be any informed consent, whether oral or written, about the risks and benefits simply because they do not know - it is still being determined. This is medical experimentation - period. Therefore, anyone has the right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment under not only US law, but international as well.

Here are the questions one must ask of the one requesting your cooperation:

Is this vaccine FDA approved? (They cannot answer anything but no.)

Is this vaccine experimental? (The answer cannot be anything but yes.)

Can you tell me what the risks of this experimental vaccine are? (In honesty they will not be able to give you a complete list of possible adverse reactions and no one has the right to force you to submit to experimentation.)

Say... no thank you... I do not wish to participate in this experiment.

45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.

None of the jabs are FDA approved vaccines. They are under Emergency Use Authorization only. The public is part of phase 4 FDA testing of these medical devices for final FDA approval. The earliest the studies are set to conclude is fall of next year. It could be several years before all the data is then analyzed and final FDA approval is sought. With complete immunity for financial liability - pun intended - why would these manufacturers be in any hurry to seek final approval? They are in a complete win win situation here. All profit and no liability.

The public is being used in the largest study ever conducted in order to evaluate these jabs. Not only is the study unprecedented, but the technology being utilized has never been used on human subjects before - ever. All of the previous animal studies done in an attempt to develop a coronavirus vaccine proved disasterous. This is why the normal animal testing used for Emergency Use Authorization was bypassed under the protection of Warp Speed. The jabs were then rushed to production and forced onto the public by coercive means and propaganda. The public is not being truly informed of the risks and theoretical benefits of this experimentation.

Here is the bottom line. The key to refusal lies within informed consent. Laws governing informed consent are contained in the framework of the Nuremberg Code which later became codified within US's own laws on informed consent. Most people are not even being given written informed consent forms. Why? The drug manufacturers cannot give the FDA guidance for this information because at this point it is only theoretical computer modeling. There cannot be any informed consent, whether oral or written, about the risks and benefits simply because they do not know - it is still being determined. This is medical experimentation - period. Therefore, anyone has the right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment by not only US law, but international as well.

Here are the questions one must ask of the one requesting your cooperation:

Is this vaccine FDA approved? (They cannot answer anything but no.)

Is this vaccine experimental? (The answer cannot be anything but yes.)

Can you tell me what the risks of this experimental vaccine are? (In honesty they will not be able to give you a complete list of possible adverse reactions and no one has the right to force you to submit to experimentation.)

Say... no thank you... I do not wish to participate in this experiment.

45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.

None of the jabs are FDA approved vaccines. They are under Emergency Use Authorization only. The public is part of phase 4 FDA testing of these medical devices for final FDA approval. The earliest the studies are set to conclude is fall of next year. It could be several years before all the data is then analyzed and final FDA approval is sought. With complete immunity for financial liability - pun intended - why would these manufacturers be in any hurry to seek final approval? They are in a complete win win situation here. All profit and no liability.

The public is being used in the largest study ever conducted in order to evaluate these jabs. Not only is the study unprecedented, but the technology being utilized has never been used on human subjects before - ever. All of the previous animal studies done in an attempt to develop a coronavirus vaccine proved disasterous. This is why the normal animal testing used for Emergency Use Authorization was bypassed under the protection of Warp Speed. The jabs were then rushed to production and forced onto the public by coercive means and propaganda. The public is not being truly informed of the risks and theoretical benefits of this experimentation.

Here is the bottom line. The key to refusal lies within informed consent. Laws governing informed consent are contained in the framework of the Nuremberg Code which later became codified within US's own laws on informed consent. Most people are not even being given written informed consent forms. Why? The drug manufacturers cannot give the FDA guidance for this information because at this point it is only theoretical computer modeling. There cannot be any informed consent in writing about the risks and benefits simply because they do not know - it is still being determined. This is medical experimentation - period. Therefore, anyone has the right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment by not only US law, but international as well.

Here are the questions one must ask of the one requesting your cooperation:

Is this vaccine FDA approved? (They cannot answer anything but no.)

Is this vaccine experimental? (The answer cannot be anything but yes.)

Can you tell me what the risks of this experimental vaccine are? (In honesty they will not be able to give you a complete list of possible adverse reactions and no one has the right to force you to submit to experimentation.)

Say... no thank you... I do not wish to participate in this experiment.

45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.

None of the jabs are FDA approved vaccines. They are under Emergency Use Authorization only. The public is part of phase 4 FDA testing of these medical devices for final FDA approval. The earliest the studies are set to conclude is fall of next year. It could be several years before all the data is then analyzed and final FDA approval is sought. With complete immunity for financial liability - pun intended - why would these manufacturers be in any hurry to seek final approval? They are in a complete win win situation here. All profit and no liability.

The public is being used in the largest study ever conducted in order to evaluate these jabs. Not only is the study unprecedented, but the technology being utilized has never been used on human subjects before - ever. All of the previous animal studies done in an attempt to develop a coronavirus vaccine proved disasterous. This is why the normal animal testing used for Emergency Use Authorization was bypassed under the protection of Warp Speed. The jabs were then rushed to production and forced onto the public by coercive means and propaganda. The public is not being truly informed of the risks and theoretical benefits of this experimentation.

Here is the bottom line. The key to refusal lies within informed consent. Laws governing informed consent are contained in the framework of the Nuremberg Code which later became codified within US's own laws on informed consent. Most people are not even being given written informed consent forms. Why? The drug manufacturers cannot give the FDA guidance for this information because at this point it is only theoretical computer modeling. There cannot be any informed consent in writing about the risks and benefits simply because they do not know - it is still being determined. This is medical experimentation - period. Therefore, anyone has the right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment by not only US law, but international as well.

Here are the questions one must ask of the one requesting your cooperation:

Is this vaccine FDA approved? (They cannot answer anything but no.)

Is this vaccine experimental? (The answer cannot be anything but yes.)

Can you tell me what the risks of this experimental vaccine are? (In honesty they will not be able to give you a complete list of possible adverse reactions and no one has the right to force you to submit to experimentation.)

Say... no thank you... I do not wish to participate in this experiment.