There are indeed lies that circulate here, and like anywhere, discernment is absolutely key.

I agree, but a lie circulating and a lie being pushed as truth without evidence (or with a basis in other lies) are not the same thing.

I believe most people here do not believe in any of the following things... ...Or any such absurdities.

I have seen evidence of all of those things. In some cases the evidence is compelling, even if controversial. In other cases the evidence is not compelling, and I give them a very low probability of being an accurate accounting of reality. In every case my mind is open to new evidence should it present itself.

In other words, I do not believe any of them, but I don't disbelieve any of them either. I think at this point anyone who is honest with themselves would recognize that to grab onto the belief that something isn't true just because the evidence has not met the threshold of "beyond a reasonable doubt" or even "preponderance of evidence" is doing so to appease their own sensibility, and is not allowing for the fact that most of the truth about life, the universe, and everything that has happened on this planet for all of our history has been purposefully hidden from us.

We must remain cognizant of this fact at every moment in our discoveries. Like you said, discernment is key, but it is not the only key. There is also a necessity of constant suspension of disbelief. A person, or a group of investigators cannot get to the truth if they permanently dismiss an idea just because at the time there is insufficient evidence for consensus support of it.

At this point, anything is possible. To deny the evidence of Prince Phillip e.g. is ludicrous, and I quite frankly can't believe you put that one on the list. Chemtrails also have a fair bit of evidence. Indeed, there is zero doubt whatsoever that we do in fact seed our atmosphere with many things and have for decades. The only difference between that and "chemtrails" is one of amount. So in your mind, anyone who believes it happens often, v. those that just think it happens sometimes are crazy. That is a fine line you are choosing to place that may be limiting your ability to listen and discern.

There are indeed lies that circulate here, and like anywhere, discernment is absolutely key.

I agree, but a lie circulating and a lie being pushed as truth without evidence (or with a basis in other lies) are not the same thing.

I believe most people here do not believe in any of the following things... ...Or any such absurdities.

I have seen evidence of all of those things. In some cases the evidence is compelling, even if controversial. In other cases the evidence is not compelling, and I give them a very low probability of being an accurate accounting of reality. In every case my mind is open to new evidence should it present itself.

In other words, I do not believe any of them, but I don't disbelieve any of them either. I think at this point anyone who is honest with themselves would recognize that to grab onto some belief because the evidence has not met the threshold of "beyond a reasonable doubt" or even "preponderance of evidence" is doing so to appease their own sensibility, and is not allowing for the fact that most of the truth about life, the universe, and everything that has happened on this planet for all of our history has been purposefully hidden from us.

We must remain cognizant of this fact at every moment in our discoveries. Like you said, discernment is key, but it is not the only key. There is also a necessity of constant suspension of disbelief. A person, or a group of investigators cannot get to the truth if they permanently dismiss an idea just because at the time there is insufficient evidence for consensus support of it.

At this point, anything is possible. To deny the evidence of Prince Phillip e.g. is ludicrous, and I quite frankly can't believe you put that one on the list. Chemtrails also have a fair bit of evidence. Indeed, there is zero doubt whatsoever that we do in fact seed our atmosphere with many things and have for decades. The only difference between that and "chemtrails" is one of amount. So in your mind, anyone who believes it happens often, v. those that just think it happens sometimes are crazy. That is a fine line you are choosing to place that may be limiting your ability to listen and discern.