Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Thanks! It was just my musings, I wanted to write them down whilst they were fresh in my mind.

The more I think about things, the more I realise they've tried this before and been foiled. SARS, swine flu, bird flu, all predicted to be catastrophic pandemics, all non-starters with jettisoned vaccines. And the common link with Neil Ferguson, SERCO, UK Crown. I can't help but think that this virus was intercepted and diluted, resulting in it yet again not being the pandemic they wanted. If I try and think logically, it would make more sense to have the devastating 'wipeout' first, as predicted each time, then for those left behind to be 'mopped up' by vaccines, which by then they'd be clamouring for.

If you think about the 16 year plan between OBASTURD and Killary, a pandemic that truly wipes out a ton of the world's population would have fitted in with the timeline of her second term, then killer vaccines could have finished the remainers off down to the required 500 million. Trump fucked the 16 year plan up by four years so, desperate times call for desperate measures you know, and they knew they needed cover for the election fraud to get him out by any means necessary, so the virus would be the 'last resort' even though it might have been compromised and thus not as effective as it needed to be (which it hasn't been). It makes sense when you think about the disparity between the narrative (prescripted, enacted prematurely thus no time to revise it) and the actual, this is the shittest pandemic that isn't ever. And hence, maybe these vaccines aren't the kill shots they had ready to go, but they've managed to contaminate a certain number of batches.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Thanks! It was just my musings, I wanted to write them down whilst they were fresh in my mind.

The more I think about things, the more I realise they've tried this before and been foiled. SARS, swine flu, bird flu, all predicted to be catastrophic pandemics, all non-starters with jettisoned vaccines. And the common link with Neil Ferguson, SERCO, UK Crown. I can't help but think that this virus was intercepted and diluted, resulting in it yet again not being the pandemic they wanted. If I try and think logically, it would make more sense to have the devastating 'wipeout' first, as predicted each time, then for those left behind to be 'mopped up' by vaccines, which by then they'd be clamouring for.

If you think about the 16 year plan between OBASTURD and Killary, a pandemic that truly wipes out a ton of the world's population would have fitted in with the timeline of her second term, then killer vaccines could have finished the remainers off down to the required 500 million. Trump fucked the 16 year plan up by four years so, desperate times call for desperate measures you know, and they knew they needed cover for the election fraud to get him out by any means necessary, so the virus would be the 'last resort' even though it might have been compromised and thus not as effective as it needed to be (which it hasn't been). It makes sense when you think about the disparity between the narrative (prescripted, enacted prematurely thus no time to revise it) and the actual, this is the shittest pandemic that isn't ever. And hence, maybe these vaccines aren't the kill shots they had ready to go, but they've managed to contaminate a certain number of batches.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Thanks! It was just my musings, I wanted to write them down whilst they were fresh in my mind.

The more I think about things, the more I realise they've tried this before and been foiled. SARS, swine flu, bird flu, all predicted to be catastrophic pandemics, all non-starters with jettisoned vaccines. And the common link with Neil Ferguson, SERCO, UK Crown. I can't help but think that this virus was intercepted and diluted, resulting in it yet again not being the pandemic they wanted. If I try and think logically, it would make more sense to have the devastating 'wipeout' first, as predicted each time, then for those left behind to be 'mopped up' by vaccines, which by then they'd be clamouring for.

If you think about the 16 year plan between OBASTURD and Killary, a pandemic that truly wipes out a ton of the world's population would have fitted in with the timeline of her second term, then killer vaccines could have finished the remainers off down to the required 500 million. Trump fucked the 16 year plan up by four years so, desperate times call for desperate measures you know, and they knew they needed cover for the election fraud to get him out by any means necessary, so the virus would be the 'last resort' even though it might have been compromised and thus not as effective as it needed to be (which it hasn't been). It makes sense when you think about the disparity between the narrative (prescripted, enacted prematurely thus no time to revise it) and the actual, this is the shittest pandemic that isn't ever. And hence, maybe these vaccines aren't the kill shots they had ready to go, but they've managed to contaminate a certain number of batches.

3 years ago
1 score