This report makes several errors. It incorrectly states that the SARS-cov-2 vaccine has been shown to write to DNA. This is false. The experiment cited begins with the premise that because people who have had Covid are later getting diagnosed with covid again (by the fraudulent PCR test!!!), that it is because the virus (not the vaccine) is being written to the DNA.

It then goes on to show that under lab conditions, when you take away the safeguards that exist in cells in vivo (inducing mitosis while under viral load) and introduce exogenous tools to make it happen (induced expression of HIV and LINE-1 Reverse Transcriptase) that the virus can write to DNA. Well of course it can, you just made it do it. It then showed that they got a positive result by only doing the first (induced mitosis while under viral load). But this is still the removal of a safeguard that is in place in vivo, and their positive results signal was so low as to be ridiculous. That doesn't mean it didn't happen, but if it did it was such a small occurrence as to have insufficient statistically meaningful result.

Then the other paper they are making the connection with to "prove" their overall theory of "causes neurodegenerative disease" is only showing a sequence similarity with another protein that can misfold, which can eventually lead to neurodegenerative diseases. There are several problems with that paper as well, or at least with the conclusions that are being drawn from it. Protein folding relies on numerous factors, the most important of which in this case is the other molecular forces that come into play during the folding process. Each protein is completely different (for this discussion), with different interactions among the molecules in the secondary and tertiary structure as the folding process happens. So any one individual domain will only play so big a part in the folding of any one particular protein, because all the other interactions are a fundamental part of the process.

In order to show that the spike protein ACTUALLY misfolds in a smiliar manner, it would require doing ACTUAL experiments. Is it something worth looking into? Sure, I guess, but the paper did NOT show anything of the sort that is being claimed.

So both papers did not really say what the article writer is saying they said. The article made both mistakes (big enough to make the entire argument fall apart), AND false extrapolations (each of which also makes the entire argument fall apart).

I don't know why this article was printed (misinfo or disinfo), but it is wrong, for all the reasons I have stated. If there is any truth to the claims, the evidence they have presented does not show it in any way.

This report makes several errors. It incorrectly states that the SARS-cov-2 vaccine has been shown to write to DNA. This is false. The experiment cited begins with the premise that because people who have had Covid are later getting diagnosed with covid again (by the fraudulent PCR test!!!), that it is because the virus (not the vaccine) is being written to the DNA.

It then goes on to show that under lab conditions, when you take away the safeguards that exist in cells in vivo (inducing mitosis while under viral load) and introduce exogenous tools to make it happen (induced expression of HIV and LINE-1 Reverse Transcriptase) that the virus can write to DNA. Well of course it can, you just made it do it. It then showed that they got a positive result by only doing the first (induced mitosis while under viral load). But this is still the removal of a safeguard that is in place in vivo, and their positive results signal was so low as to be ridiculous. That doesn't mean it didn't happen, but if it did it was such a small occurrence as to have insufficient statistically meaningful result.

Then the other paper they are making the connection with to "prove" their overall theory of "causes neurodegenerative disease" is only showing a sequence similarity with another protein that can misfold, which can eventually lead to neurodegenerative diseases. There are several problems with that paper as well, or at least with the conclusions that are being drawn from it. Protein folding relies on numerous factors, the most important of which in this case is the other molecular forces that come into play during the folding process. Each protein is completely different (for this discussion), with different interactions among the molecules in the secondary and tertiary structure as the folding process happens. So any one individual domain will only play so big a part in the folding of any one particular protein, because all the other interactions are a fundamental part of the process.

In order to show that the spike protein ACTUALLY misfolds in a smiliar manner, it would require doing ACTUAL experiments. Is it something worth looking into? Sure, I guess, but the paper did NOT show anything of the sort that is being claimed.

So both papers did not really say what the article writer is saying they said. The article made both mistakes (big enough to make the entire argument fall apart), AND false extrapolations (each of which also makes the entire argument fall apart).

I don't know why this article was printed (misinfo or disinfo), but it is wrong, for all the reasons I have stated. If there is any truth to the claims, the evidence they have presented does not show it in any way.

This report makes several errors. It incorrectly states that the SARS-cov-2 vaccine has been shown to write to DNA. This is false. The experiment cited begins with the premise that because people who have had Covid are later getting diagnosed with covid again, that it is because the virus (not the vaccine) is being written to the DNA.

It then goes on to show that under lab conditions, when you take away the safeguards that exist in cells in vivo (inducing mitosis while under viral load) and introduce exogenous tools to make it happen (induced expression of HIV and LINE-1 Reverse Transcriptase) that the virus can write to DNA. Well of course it can, you just made it do it. It then showed that they got a positive result by only doing the first (induced mitosis while under viral load). But this is still the removal of a safeguard that is in place in vivo, and their positive results signal was so low as to be ridiculous. That doesn't mean it didn't happen, but if it did it was such a small occurrence as to have insufficient statistically meaningful result.

Then the other paper they are making the connection with to "prove" their overall theory of "causes neurodegenerative disease" is only showing a sequence similarity with another protein that can misfold, which can eventually lead to neurodegenerative diseases. There are several problems with that paper as well, or at least with the conclusions that are being drawn from it. Protein folding relies on numerous factors, the most important of which in this case is the other molecular forces that come into play during the folding process. Each protein is completely different (for this discussion), with different interactions among the molecules in the secondary and tertiary structure as the folding process happens. So any one individual domain will only play so big a part in the folding of any one particular protein, because all the other interactions are a fundamental part of the process.

In order to show that the spike protein ACTUALLY misfolds in a smiliar manner, it would require doing ACTUAL experiments. Is it something worth looking into? Sure, I guess, but the paper did NOT show anything of the sort that is being claimed.

So both papers did not really say what the article writer is saying they said. The article made both mistakes (big enough to make the entire argument fall apart), AND false extrapolations (each of which also makes the entire argument fall apart).

I don't know why this article was printed (misinfo or disinfo), but it is wrong, for all the reasons I have stated. If there is any truth to the claims, the evidence they have presented does not show it in any way.