Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument. If you don't like the misrepresentation then correct it instead of leaving it ambiguously in your favor.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons. I should accuse you of cherry-picking though, and would be more rightful to make such a claim since you just completely ignored those posts and instead literally cherry-picked others.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently. Good to know how quick you are to make such rash claims without even looking into it in the slightest though.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here. Maybe you could learn something from such an "overzealous" an "immature" individual like me. I'm here to straighten out spineless faggots like you.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument. If you don't like the misrepresentation then correct it instead of leaving it ambiguously in your favor.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons. I should accuse you of cherry-picking though, and would be more rightful to make such a claim since you just completely ignored those posts and instead literally cherry-picked others.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently. Good to know how quick you are to make such rash claims without even looking into it in the slightest though.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here. Maybe you could learn something from such an "overzealous" an "immature" individual like me.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons. I should accuse you of cherry-picking though, and would be more rightful to make such a claim since you just completely ignored those posts and instead literally cherry-picked others.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently. Good to know how quick you are to make such rash claims without even looking into it in the slightest though.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here. Maybe you could learn something from such an "overzealous" an "immature" individual like me.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons. I should accuse you of cherry-picking though, and would be more rightful to make such a claim since you just completely ignored those posts and instead literally cherry-picked others.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently. Good to know how quick you are to make such rash claims without even looking into it in the slightest though.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons. I should accuse you of cherry-picking though, and would be more rightful to make such a claim since you just completely ignored those posts and instead literally cherry-picked others.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument.

No cherry picking here, I even offered for you to cite whatever post you wanted. I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. You clearly think we all need to maintain optics or else the boogyman will make fun of us. So it wasn't a strawman and I think you just like the deflection instead of addressing the core argument.

No cherry picking here, I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us. What else do I have to go off of? You weren't citing any posts and you still don't explain what you cite.

No cherry picking here, I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or "optics are important" lines surrounded by context having nothing to do with anons, and everything to do with high-level figureheads, to mean that it applies to ALL of us.

No cherry picking here, I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or generic "optics are important" posts to mean that it applies to ALL of us,

No cherry picking here, I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care about what unreasonable people think of me, unlike you apparently.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.

Yes, you said that we must maintain optics. I could only assume you are taking Q posts on POTUS optics or generic "optics are important" posts to mean that it applies to ALL of us,

No cherry picking here, I just think its hilarious that Q can say that optics don't matter in some scenarios and then you take specific scenarios and conflate it with anons.

Those posts have nothing to do with anon optics, and everything to do with Trump Admin optics.

I didn't look through your history to judge you because I'm not a faggot, and I don't give a shit whether you think I'm a shill or not. I don't care my ego like you.

"I could go on but you're not worth it because you are just here to waste my time."

Did you seriously need to pave your way out so you can tuck your tail while maintaining your perceived superiority? You're the lazy one afraid of discussion here.