Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.

Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.

Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.

I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. The Hessians didn't expect the Patriots to cross the Delaware but through faith and skill they did. To quote Sun Tzu;

"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."

Or to put it simply and quote Pantera

"To be, to see cannot be taught."

Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.

Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.

Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.

I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. to quote Sun Tzu;

"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."

Or to put it simply and quote Pantera

"To be, to see cannot be taught."