How's this for logic.

The means Rudy obtained information from the Ukraine made it inadmissible in court.

Now everything he had was obtained with a warrant making it admissible in court. They didn't need a copy of the laptop because it was already legally obtained.

Drop #1287

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? Who has everything? Methods which info collected/ obtained? Admissible in the court of law? Insert Rudy.

How's this for logic.

The means Rudy obtained information from the Ukraine made it inadmissible in court.

Now everything he had was obtained with a subpoena making it admissible in court. They didn't need a copy of the laptop because it was already legally obtained.

Drop #1287

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? Who has everything? Methods which info collected/ obtained? Admissible in the court of law? Insert Rudy.