Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Mods bringing it! So Maricopa denies the existence of watermarks (which we knew) but they’re looking anyway. I think the logical conclusion is that white hats have included secret watermarks in ballot paper that the local governments didn’t know about. Otherwise why waste the time when it’s already a huge operation they’re undertaking? The military has been in control the whole time. (Option B, which I think is less likely but possible, is the auditors are just running up the bill. Option C is that the dems committed fraud with watermarked paper when the actual ballots have no watermark, but that’s low iq even for them)

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Mods bringing it! So Maricopa denies the existence of watermarks (which we knew) but they’re looking anyway. I think the logical conclusion is that white hats have included secret watermarks in ballot paper that the local governments didn’t know about. Otherwise why waste the time when it’s already a huge operation they’re undertaking? The military has been in control the whole time. (Option B, which I think is less likely but possible, is the auditors are just running up the bill. Option C is that the dems committed fraud with watermarked paper when the actual ballots have no watermark, but that’s low iq even for them)

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Mods bringing it! So Maricopa denies the existence of watermarks (which we knew) but they’re looking anyway. I think the logical conclusion is that white hats have secret watermarks that the local governments didn’t know about. Otherwise why waste the time when it’s already a huge operation they’re undertaking? The military has been in control the whole time. (Option B, which I think is less likely but possible, is the auditors are just running up the bill. Option C is that the dems committed fraud with watermarked paper, but that’s low iq even for them)

3 years ago
1 score