Hello fellow patriots (imagine me holding a skateboard and looking a lot like Steve Buscemi)...
With a joke out of the way, let's get serious. I'm a newfag around here, only started really looking at Q seriously last week or so. I'm a LONG time /r/the_donald, TDW, and now PW member and I always saw Q as a dangerous larp. I was badmouthing you all very recently (which you can see in my history), so I won't pretend to be one of you just yet. However, in the last few weeks, I realized that I had no real evidence or basis for that belief, so I decided to check it out for myself. I started listening to X22, RedPill78, reading a ton of posts here, and digging further.
Well, I think y'all are on to something here, so I'm staying around to learn more.
However... I noticed something that may be damaging to this site and how PW and normies see us, and that is a LOT of confirmation bias since the inauguration.
Let me use an example: the fake oval office. First of all, I'm onboard with the idea that the inauguration MAY have been pre-recorded and faked. None of us know for a fact. However, having read a ton of posts here about it I see confirmation bias everywhere. People are regurgitating what others have SPECULATED as evidence to support their own jump to conclusions.
Given that I don't have the wealth of Q knowledge that you all do here, my instinct is to apply logic rather than look for specific Q posts to explain what I'm seeing. Let's take the painting in the oval office as an example. Many are saying that because the paintings match, Biden was in the Castle Rock studio. But why can't it be the other way? In order to make a realistic set, Castle Rock put the same painting on their set as was in the real oval office. Furthermore, one of our mods pointed out (https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJoc4pqJ/x/c/4DvmPdkcCnN) that the same painting was in the real oval office during Trump's presidency, but nobody has accepted that fact because it goes against what we all want to believe to be true.
So, I think we all have to take a step back, take a breath, and try to be logical. You're all research machines, your autism is honestly mind-boggling and I'm super impressed. But we're all running super hot right now, emotions are high, and as a result I think we're jumping to said conclusions prematurely. We ALL want them to be true, but let's not act like the media portrays us to be, alright?
Edit: from one of the comments below, more proof about the office being legit that looks plausible to me: https://media.greatawakening.win/post/NY0qZ4H3.jpeg
Thank you for reading.
Hello fellow patriots (imagine me holding a skateboard and looking a lot like Steve Buscemi)...
With a joke out of the way, let's get serious. I'm a newfag around here, only started really looking at Q seriously last week or so. I'm a LONG time /r/the_donald, TDW, and now PW member and I always saw Q as a dangerous larp. I was badmouthing you all very recently (which you can see in my history), so I won't pretend to be one of you just yet. However, in the last few weeks, I realized that I had no real evidence or basis for that belief, so I decided to check it out for myself. I started listening to X22, RedPill78, reading a ton of posts here, and digging further.
Well, I think y'all are on to something here, so I'm staying around to learn more.
However... I noticed something that may be damaging to this site and how PW and normies see us, and that is a LOT of confirmation bias since the inauguration.
Let me use an example: the fake oval office. First of all, I'm onboard with the idea that the inauguration MAY have been pre-recorded and faked. None of us know for a fact. However, having read a ton of posts here about it I see confirmation bias everywhere. People are regurgitating what others have SPECULATED as evidence to support their own jump to conclusions.
Given that I don't have the wealth of Q knowledge that you all do here, my instinct is to apply logic rather than look for specific Q posts to explain what I'm seeing. Let's take the painting in the oval office as an example. Many are saying that because the paintings match, Biden was in the Castle Rock studio. But why can't it be the other way? In order to make a realistic set, Castle Rock put the same painting on their set as was in the real oval office. Furthermore, one of our mods pointed out (https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJoc4pqJ/x/c/4DvmPdkcCnN) that the same painting was in the real oval office during Trump's presidency, but nobody has accepted that fact because it goes against what we all want to believe to be true.
So, I think we all have to take a step back, take a breath, and try to be logical. You're all research machines, your autism is honestly mind-boggling and I'm super impressed. But we're all running super hot right now, emotions are high, and as a result I think we're jumping to said conclusions prematurely. We ALL want them to be true, but let's not act like the media portrays us to be, alright?
Thank you for reading.
Hello fellow patriots (imagine me holding a skateboard and looking a lot like Steve Buscemi)...
With a joke out of the way, let's get serious. I'm a newfag around here, only started really looking at Q seriously last week or so. I'm a LONG time /r/the_donald, TDW, and now PW member and I always saw Q as a dangerous larp. I was badmouthing you all very recently (which you can see in my history), so I won't pretend to be one of you just yet. However, in the last few weeks, I realized that I had no real evidence or basis for that belief, so I decided to check it out for myself. I started listening to X22, RedPill78, reading a ton of posts here, and digging further.
Well, I think y'all are on to something here, so I'm staying around to learn more.
However... I noticed something that may be damaging to this site and how PW and normies see us, and that is a LOT of confirmation bias since the inauguration.
Let me use an example: the fake oval office. First of all, I'm onboard with the idea that the inauguration MAY have been pre-recorded and faked. None of us know for a fact. However, having read a ton of posts here about it I see confirmation bias everywhere. People are regurgitating what others have SPECULATED as evidence to support their own jump to conclusions.
Given that I don't have the wealth of Q knowledge that you all do here, my instinct is to apply logic rather than look for specific Q posts to explain what I'm seeing. Let's take the painting in the oval office as an example. Many are saying that because the paintings match, Biden was in the Castle Rock studio. But why can't it be the other way? In order to make a realistic set, Castle Rock put the same painting on their set as was in the real oval office. Furthermore, someone (mod I think?) pointed out that the same painting was in the real oval office during at least one Trump video/picture taken... but nobody has accepted that fact because it goes against what we all want to believe to be true.
So, I think we all have to take a step back, take a breath, and try to be logical. You're all research machines, your autism is honestly mind-boggling and I'm super impressed. But we're all running super hot right now, emotions are high, and as a result I think we're jumping to said conclusions prematurely. We ALL want them to be true, but let's not act like the media portrays us to be, alright?
Thank you for reading.