Thank you for the inquiry. At least you are attempting to use that brain you were given in order to try to solve problems - something too few are able to do nowadays. I will try to answer your questions the best I can.

To put it simply, our innate immune response to respiratory pathogens takes place naturally in the lung tissue because this is the point of entry. There is a non specific immune response always on the ready to take care of invaders and takes place in the tissue. A localized response is mounted while at the same time modulating that response as to not interfere with critical lung function. As an infection increases, more and more resources are deployed to fight that infection and clean up the damage and waste by way of chemical messaging.

What you speak of relates to adaptive specific immune responses that also take place more locally in the lung tissue. Your inquiry is related to B-cell adaptive immune capabilities that result in specific antibody production against a specific pathogen. B-cells are developed in the bone marrow and then migrate to the spleen and lymph nodes. This is where they become activated in response to antigens. In the case of respiratory infections this takes place locally in the lungs and its associated lymphatic tissue. (This is why cancer is located first in localized lymph nodes before it metastasizes.)

Targeting a specific B-cell by giving an antigen in the blood that causes activation throughout the entire body versus a more natural localized activation, like in the case of respiratory infection, is like trying to kill a gnat with a sledge hammer. The gnat may still get away but the furniture gets destroyed - in the entire house. And all of this destruction takes place before the gnat even shows up - but the hammer stays ready.

There are many more cells and immune modulating molecules involved than just B-cells or antibodies. Just the same as an army does not go to war using only a single type of strategy or weapon, our immune system uses a variety of defensive and offensive mechanisms to fight infection. Because the immune response in respiratory infections is not completely understood and is complicated, we have been limited as to the success of preventatives such as vaccines. It is just not that simple even though they try to make it sound that way.

Having a antibody produced by B-cells using antigen presentation thru viral vaccines prior to organic infection, is basically in theory only a time saver with regard to the production of those specific antibodies. Because those antibodies arrive sooner, the severity of the infection is lessened - sometimes to the point of not feeling ill at all - providing that the rest of the immune system is functioning properly as well. This is why vaccines against respiratory viral infections generally only work to lessen symptoms. They are limited as to preventing infection and most certainly do not prevent transmission. Sound familiar?

As in the case with influenza, a person's own immune capability will be the determining factor as to whether they can successfully mount a challenge to infection. IMHO attempts to meddle with this ballet called our immune response to viral infections, most of which are more a nuisance than deadly for the immune healthy, have caused far more harm than any perceived good. Our bodies are being forced to utilize finite resources to mount a generalized response that was meant to be taken care of locally. Can you say autoimmune disease?

When we start thinking about this whole plandemic in terms of an eugenicist bioweapon instead of an organic viral infection, we will go much further in protecting ourselves against what the globalist agenda is trying to unleash upon us. I hope this helps.

Thank you for the inquiry. At least you are attempting to use that brain you were given in order to try to solve problems - something too few are able to do nowadays. I will try to answer your questions the best I can.

To put it simply, our innate immune response to respiratory pathogens takes place naturally in the lung tissue because this is the point of entry. There is a non specific immune response always on the ready to take care of invaders and takes place in the tissue. A localized response is mounted while at the same time modulating that response as to not interfere with critical lung function. As an infection increases, more and more resources are deployed to fight that infection and clean up the damage and waste by way of chemical messaging.

What you speak of relates to adaptive specific immune responses that also take place more locally in the lung tissue. Your inquiry is related to B-cell adaptive immune capabilities that result in specific antibody production against a specific pathogen. B-cells are developed in the bone marrow and then migrate to the spleen and lymph nodes. This is where they become activated in response to antigens. In the case of respiratory infections this takes place locally in the lungs and its associated lymphatic tissue. (This is why cancer is located first in localized lymph nodes before it metastasizes.)

Targeting a specific B-cell by giving an antigen in the blood that causes activation throughout the entire body versus a more natural localized activation, like in the case of respiratory infection, is like trying to kill a gnat with a sledge hammer. Chances are the gnat gets away but the furniture gets destroyed - in the entire house. And all of this destruction takes place before the gnat even shows up - but the hammer stays ready.

There are many more cells and immune modulating molecules involved than just B-cells or antibodies. Just the same as an army does not go to war using only a single type of strategy or weapon, our immune system uses a variety of defensive and offensive mechanisms to fight infection. Because the immune response in respiratory infections is not completely understood and is complicated, we have been limited as to the success of preventatives such as vaccines. It is just not that simple even though they try to make it sound that way.

Having a antibody produced by B-cells using antigen presentation thru viral vaccines prior to organic infection, is basically in theory only a time saver with regard to the production of those specific antibodies. Because those antibodies arrive sooner, the severity of the infection is lessened - sometimes to the point of not feeling ill at all - providing that the rest of the immune system is functioning properly as well. This is why vaccines against respiratory viral infections generally only work to lessen symptoms. They are limited as to preventing infection and most certainly do not prevent transmission. Sound familiar?

As in the case with influenza, a person's own immune capability will be the determining factor as to whether they can successfully mount a challenge to infection. IMHO attempts to meddle with this ballet called our immune response to viral infections, most of which are more a nuisance than deadly for the immune healthy, have caused far more harm than any perceived good. Our bodies are being forced to utilize finite resources to mount a generalized response that was meant to be taken care of locally. Can you say autoimmune disease?

When we start thinking about this whole plandemic in terms of an eugenicist bioweapon instead of an organic viral infection, we will go much further in protecting ourselves against what the globalist agenda is trying to unleash upon us. I hope this helps.

Thank you for the inquiry. At least you are attempting to use that brain you were given in order to try to solve problems - something too few are able to do nowadays. I will try to answer your questions the best I can.

To put it simply, our innate immune response to respiratory pathogens takes place naturally in the lung tissue because this is the point of entry. There is a non specific immune response always on the ready to take care of invaders and takes place in the tissue. A localized response is mounted while at the same time modulating that response as to not interfere with critical lung function. As an infection increases, more and more resources are deployed to fight that infection and clean up the damage and waste by way of chemical messaging.

What you speak of relates to adaptive specific immune responses that also take place more locally in the lung tissue. Your inquiry is related to B-cell adaptive immune capabilities that result in specific antibody production against a specific pathogen. B-cells are developed in the bone marrow and then migrate to the spleen and lymph nodes. This is where they become activated in response to antigens. In the case of respiratory infections this takes place locally in the lungs and its associated lymphatic tissue.

Targeting a specific B-cell by giving an antigen in the blood that causes activation throughout the entire body versus a more natural localized activation, like in the case of respiratory infection, is like trying to kill a gnat with a sledge hammer. Chances are the gnat gets away but the furniture gets destroyed - in the entire house. And all of this destruction takes place before the gnat even shows up - but the hammer stays ready.

There are many more cells and immune modulating molecules involved than just B-cells or antibodies. Just the same as an army does not go to war using only a single type of strategy or weapon, our immune system uses a variety of defensive and offensive mechanisms to fight infection. Because the immune response in respiratory infections is not completely understood and is complicated, we have been limited as to the success of preventatives such as vaccines. It is just not that simple even though they try to make it sound that way.

Having a antibody produced by B-cells using antigen presentation thru viral vaccines prior to organic infection, is basically in theory only a time saver with regard to the production of those specific antibodies. Because those antibodies arrive sooner, the severity of the infection is lessened - sometimes to the point of not feeling ill at all - providing that the rest of the immune system is functioning properly as well. This is why vaccines against respiratory viral infections generally only work to lessen symptoms. They are limited as to preventing infection and most certainly do not prevent transmission. Sound familiar?

As in the case with influenza, a person's own immune capability will be the determining factor as to whether they can successfully mount a challenge to infection. IMHO attempts to meddle with this ballet called our immune response to viral infections, most of which are more a nuisance than deadly for the immune healthy, have caused far more harm than any perceived good. Our bodies are being forced to utilize finite resources to mount a generalized response that was meant to be taken care of locally. Can you say autoimmune disease?

When we start thinking about this whole plandemic in terms of an eugenicist bioweapon instead of an organic viral infection, we will go much further in protecting ourselves against what the globalist agenda is trying to unleash upon us. I hope this helps.