"I know for a fact that many of the people who believe that body doubles are being used also believe that clones are being used."

So? And again you misuse "fact". What happened to you elsewhere has zero to do with me now. Why do you keep trying to push your cloning obsession on me?

"So again, I don’t disagree with you that sometimes body doubles are used. What I disagree with you about is the possibility of using a body double to replace someone 24 hours a day for several weeks in a row."

Ok. And you're welcome to disagree. I have no problem if you don't think that's true. That part wasn't even posted in my main argument. I theorized about that in a reply to another commenter. You could have just come in and said you disagree with what I said in the reply, but you come in hostile for no reason.

"So I disagree that Joe Biden is hidden or dead and has been replaced by one of the worlds greatest actors in history. (<-THIS IS WHAT I DISAGREE WITH)"

Again, it's fine to disagree. Look at how you came in though. You added in things that I never said and you're still doing that. I never said anything about "replaced with one of the world's greatest actors in history". Like... wut?

You keep pushing for me to argue against statements I never made.

"Fake conspiracy theories like flat earth are used to discredit real secrets like the fact that aliens have visited earth in the past and are probably visiting us today."

Where do I mention flat earth in my post? Where?

You agree with the notion of body doubles which is what the post was about. You've already said you entirely agree with that part. The only part you disagreed with was something I wrote in a reply, NOT the original post.

" the current resident of the White House will have to leave the White House."

I fully support that.

"So again, you don’t seem to understand how a disinformation operation really works or you’re just pretending not to understand how they work because you’re part of the disinformation operation."

I don't think you get how free thinking works. We are not sheep. You just said you agree with the things wrote about in the post (not the reply) and admit Biden might be a double, but you don't think it matters and therefore should not be mentioned because you think normies won't like it.

Even Q posts were clear that this was about more than election. This was about the Great Awakening. We can't avoid ideas just because normies aren't willing to think about them. Winning an election will mean little if you don't get the Great Awakening. It will all happen again if the sheep don't wake up.

I'm going to disagree with you entirely on avoiding topics because normies won't like it.

Normies can grow the f up.

"I don’t believe it is possible to permanently replace Joe Biden for weeks at a time."

Ok. That's not a problem if you disagree. I don't have a problem with you disagreeing. That's part of a discussion. It's the back and forth.

I think the main things we disagree on is that you don't want things posted on a Q forum that normies won't like. I disagree with you on that. I think the Great Awakening is the most important goal of Q. Normies need to wake up for anything to change. We need to talk about the uncomfortable ideas or nothing will ever get better.

But you're free to disagree.

"I know for a fact that many of the people who believe that body doubles are being used also believe that clones are being used."

So? What happened to you elsewhere has zero to do with me now. Why do you keep trying to push your cloning obsession on me?

"So again, I don’t disagree with you that sometimes body doubles are used. What I disagree with you about is the possibility of using a body double to replace someone 24 hours a day for several weeks in a row."

Ok. And you're welcome to disagree. I have no problem if you don't think that's true. That part wasn't even posted in my main argument. I theorized about that in a reply to another commenter. You could have just come in and said you disagree with what I said in the reply, but you come in hostile for no reason.

"So I disagree that Joe Biden is hidden or dead and has been replaced by one of the worlds greatest actors in history. (<-THIS IS WHAT I DISAGREE WITH)"

Again, it's fine to disagree. Look at how you came in though. You added in things that I never said and you're still doing that. I never said anything about "replaced with one of the world's greatest actors in history". Like... wut?

You keep pushing for me to argue against statements I never made.

"Fake conspiracy theories like flat earth are used to discredit real secrets like the fact that aliens have visited earth in the past and are probably visiting us today."

Where do I mention flat earth in my post? Where?

You agree with the notion of body doubles which is what the post was about. You've already said you entirely agree with that part. The only part you disagreed with was something I wrote in a reply, NOT the original post.

" the current resident of the White House will have to leave the White House."

I fully support that.

"So again, you don’t seem to understand how a disinformation operation really works or you’re just pretending not to understand how they work because you’re part of the disinformation operation."

I don't think you get how free thinking works. We are not sheep. You just said you agree with the things wrote about in the post (not the reply) and admit Biden might be a double, but you don't think it matters and therefore should not be mentioned because you think normies won't like it.

Even Q posts were clear that this was about more than election. This was about the Great Awakening. We can't avoid ideas just because normies aren't willing to think about them. Winning an election will mean little if you don't get the Great Awakening. It will all happen again if the sheep don't wake up.

I'm going to disagree with you entirely on avoiding topics because normies won't like it.

Normies can grow the f up.

"I don’t believe it is possible to permanently replace Joe Biden for weeks at a time."

Ok. That's not a problem if you disagree. I don't have a problem with you disagreeing. That's part of a discussion. It's the back and forth.

I think the main things we disagree on is that you don't want things posted on a Q forum that normies won't like. I disagree with you on that. I think the Great Awakening is the most important goal of Q. Normies need to wake up for anything to change. We need to talk about the uncomfortable ideas or nothing will ever get better.

But you're free to disagree.