You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?

The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.

You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:

1. Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own. In fact, they ingested far less sugar, preservatives, vaccines/meds, and other toxic substances, and experienced far less electromagnetic radiation than we do.

2. Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.

You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.

We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.

You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?

You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?

Why haven't we returned to the moon?

The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.

You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?

The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.

You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:

1. Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own.
2. Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.

You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.

We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.

You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?

You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?

Why haven't we returned to the moon?

The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.

You release your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?

The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.

We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.

You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?

You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?

Why haven't we returned to the moon?

The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.