Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique property of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world. It is only with a non-backed currency that you can create debt slavery and print currency. "Fiat currency" MEANS non-backed currency.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

All these companies are also the top shareholders in each other.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique property of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

All these companies are also the top shareholders in each other.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique property of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

All these companies are also the top shareholders in each other.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique property of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

All these companies are also the top shareholders in each other.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique property of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the market value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

All these companies are also the top shareholders in each other.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before we invented writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique properties of being the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus one of the most valuable materials used in all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the market value of the physical asset).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

They all own each other also.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Once again, someone is pointing out how its useful...

I KNOW HOW ITS USEFUL

Address the flaws I pointed out.

FFS!

it's designed to be decentralized which takes power away from the banks and FED

Taking from "the fed" and giving to "the CCP" is the same thing as stealing from a rich man's right pocket and then sticking it in his left pocket.

And once again, the instant the Luciferians/NWO decide they want to put an end to it is the instant it becomes worthless, and everyone who relies on it as a "decentralized" currency is in really bad economic shape. Why? Because it is inherently worthless.

Even gold doesn't really do anything for anyone.

Gold is the most used material for adornment. It has lustre, sheen and other physical properties that are unmatched. It was the most used adornment item from before there was writing. It is also useful in technology, though not as good as silver.

Silver also has these properties of adornment, being the second most used material for adornment. It also has the unique properties of being both the best conductor of both heat and electricity of any element in the universe, and is thus the most valuable material for all of our most common technologies.

So obviously they have actual value completely separate from their use as a currency. It was the (non-technological) value v. their rarity they had that made them such ideal currencies to begin with. It is completely disingenuous to suggest they have no intrinsic value.

But those that aren't and have real world application

Name one that has a "real world application" that isn't backed by a physical asset (and thus only worth whatever the market value of the physical asset is).

Debt and out of control currency printing is what makes us enslaved fren.

Wrong.

The fact that they moved us away from a physical currency with intrinsic value is what allowed them to move forward with their taking over of the world.

If they wanted to (if there wasn't a war going on, and/or we were sufficiently sheepified) they could end all cryptocurrencies today. They own every major corporation. EVERY SINGLE ONE. Look at Walmart for example. I chose one at random. You can choose any company you want, every one is exactly the same.

All the top shareholders are identical: Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street Corp, BoA, JP Morgan, Northern Trust, etc., etc.

They all own each other also.

All these corporations, even the ones you think are competitors are all the same company.

And guess who are the major shareholders of all those institutions that hold all the stock: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc. The instant they decide to ban all crypto its over. Hell, all they have to do is tell the CCP (which they own 100%) to make Bitcoin worthless and the biggest crypto is gone. See how well faith in the others holds up after that.

And that's all it takes. Because a non-physical backed crypto currency is backed only by faith. Once faith is gone (which is 100% controlled by the elite at the top) is the moment they become worthless.

3 years ago
1 score