Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It will have to be tested in the courts. Uncharted territory.

I will just say that a requirement to do harm to oneself, when there is no reason to do it, is not something that can be upheld in law. It is coersion.

Also, the claims made in support are all fraudulent.

Coersion and fraud are not going to be legal grounds to enforce such a crazy thing.

Also, that article is just an interview of one, single attorney. He has no legal authority. He is just giving an opinion. He might be a raging libtard masknazi lunatic for all you or I know. His opinion does not mean anything. He doesn't back up his claim with any law at all.

Just a fearporn article by a fake news journalist interviewing a libtard attorney with no authority.

Why didn't the fake news journalist interview anyone else with a different opinion? Hell, maybe they're married to each other or related. We don't know.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

It will have to be tested in the courts. Uncharted territory.

I will just say that a requirement to do harm to oneself, when there is no reason to do it, is not something that can be upheld in law. It is coersion.

Also, the claims made in support are all fraudulent.

Coersion and fraud are not going to be legal grounds to enforce such a crazy thing.

Also, that article is just an interview of one, single attorney. He has no legal authority. He is just giving an opinion. He might be a raging libtard masknazi lunatic for all you or I know. His opinion does not mean anything. He doesn't back up his claim with any law at all.

Just a fearporn article by a fake news journalist interviewing a libtard attorney with no authority.

Why didn't the fake news journalist interview anyone else with a different opinion? Hell, maybe their married to each other or related. We don't know.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

It will have to be tested in the courts. Uncharted territory.

I will just say that a requirement to do harm to oneself, when there is no reason to do it, is not something that can be upheld in law. It is coersion.

Also, the claims made in support are all fraudulent.

Coersion and fraud are not going to be legal grounds to enforce such a crazy thing.

3 years ago
1 score