Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The implication is that the person who fired back was pro-life, and was protesting the abortion first. He may have also by saving the woman's life been given the opportunity to speak to her and the clinic workers about what they do. She was taken in for questioning, likely missing her appointment because of it. He seems to have protested this clinic more than once. They know where he stands.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The implication is that the shooter was pro-life, and was protesting the abortion first. He may have also by saving the woman's life been given the opportunity to speak to her and the clinic workers about what they do. She was taken in for questioning, likely missing her appointment because of it. He seems to have protested this clinic more than once. They know where he stands.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

The implication is that the shooter was pro-life, and was protesting the abortion first. He may have also by saving the woman's life been given the opportunity to speak to her and the clinic workers about what they do. He seems to have protested this clinic more than once. They know where he stands.

3 years ago
1 score