Datefagging is a fun pasttime. Sometimes Q has been predictive and the dates have proven meaningful. The vast majority of datefagging however turns out to be not true, or at least not provably true.

Because it has been fruitful on rare occasions however, and because not all knowledge is publicly available, datefagging still happens. Like most people here, I give it no more mind than a fun game that might turn out to bear fruit, but most likely will prove not true.

The important part is, that's just us guessing. It is not a fundamental part of Q.

Q said:

Future proves past.

Q said it many times. Never once did they say "past proves future."

What that means is, we can't predict the future from the drops, we can only work backwards once events turn up that were predicted. Like the prediction of John McCain's death. His death was announced exactly 1 month later (to the minute) of the Q post that predicted it (remember to adjust all times to EST). There was no way to know at the time of the post that he would be officially dead one month later, but when it was announced and his time of death matched to the minute of the post it was obviously a prediction. The future proved the past.

So appreciate the datefagging for what it is. It's us having fun and guessing. No one gives it much weight, unless it turns out to be true (or even maybe true), and then its about as exciting as a thing can be.

Datefagging is a fun pasttime. Sometimes Q has been predictive and the dates have proven meaningful. The vast majority of datefagging however turns out to be not true, or at least not provably true.

Because it has been fruitful on rare occasions however, and because not all knowledge is publicly available, datefagging still happens. Like most people here, I give it no more mind than a fun game that might turn out to bear fruit, but most likely will prove not true.

The important part is, that's just us guessing. It is not a fundamental part of Q.

Q said:

Future proves past.

Q said it many times. Never once did they say "past proves future."

What that means is, we can't predict the future from the drops, we can only work backwards once events turn up that were predicted. Like the prediction of John McCain's death. His death was announced exactly 1 month later (to the minute) of the Q post that predicted it (remember to adjust all times to EST). There was no way to know at the time of the post that he would be officially dead one month later, but when it was announced and his time of death matched to the minute of the post it was obviously a prediction. The future proved the past.

So appreciate the datefagging for what it is. It's us having fun and guessing. No one gives it much weight, unless it turns out to be true (or even maybe true), and then its about as exciting as a thing can be.

Datefagging is a fun pasttime. Sometimes Q has been predictive and the dates have proven meaningful. The vast majority of datefagging however turns out to be not true, or at least not provably true.

Because it has been fruitful on rare occasions however, and because not all knowledge is publicly available, datefagging still happens. Like most people here, I give it no more mind than a fun game that might turn out to bear fruit, but most likely will prove not true.

The important part is, that's just us guessing. It is not a fundamental part of Q.

Q said:

Future proves past.

Q said it many times. Never once did they say "past proves future."

What that means is, we can't predict the future from the drops, we can only work backwards once events turn up that were predicted. Like the prediction of John McCain's death. It was announced exactly 1 month later (to the minute) of the Q post that predicted it (remember to adjust all times to EST). There was no way to know at the time of the post that he would be officially dead one month later, but when it was announced and his time of death matched to the minute of the post it was obviously a prediction. The future proved the past.

So appreciate the datefagging for what it is. It's us having fun and guessing. No one gives it much weight, unless it turns out to be true (or even maybe true), and then its about as exciting as a thing can be.

Datefagging is a fun pasttime. Sometimes Q has been predictive and the dates have proven meaningful. The vast majority of datefagging however turns out to be not true, or at least not provably true.

Because it has been fruitful on rare occasions however, and because not all knowledge is publicly available, datefagging still happens. Like most people here, I give it no more mind than a fun game that might turn out to bear fruit, but most likely will prove not true.

The important part it, that's just us guessing. It is not a fundamental part of Q.

Q said:

Future proves past.

Q said it many times. Never once did they say "past proves future."

What that means is, we can't predict the future from the drops, we can only work backwards once events turn up that were predicted. Like the prediction of John McCain's death. It was announced exactly 1 month later (to the minute) of the Q post that predicted it (remember to adjust all times to EST). There was no way to know at the time of the post that he would be officially dead one month later, but when it was announced and his time of death matched to the minute of the post it was obviously a prediction. The future proved the past.

So appreciate the datefagging for what it is. It's us having fun and guessing. No one gives it much weight, unless it turns out to be true (or even maybe true), and then its about as exciting as a thing can be.

Datefagging is a fun pasttime. Sometimes Q has been predictive and the dates have proven meaningful. The vast majority of datefagging however turns out to be not true, or at least not provably true.

Because it has been fruitful on rare occasions however, and because not all knowledge is publicly available, datefagging still happens. Like most people here, I give it no more mind than a fun game that might turn out to bear fruit, but most likely will prove not true.

The important part it, that's just us guessing. It is not a fundamental part of Q.

Q said:

Future proves past.

Q said it many times. Never once did they say "past proves future."

What that means is, we can't predict the future from the drops, we can only work backwards once events turn up that were predicted. Like the prediction of John McCain's death. It was announced exactly 1 month later (to the minute) of the Q post that predicted it (remember to adjust all times to EST). There was no way to know at the time of the post that he would be officially dead 30 days later, but when it was announced and his time of death matched to the minute of the post it was obviously a prediction. The future proved the past.

So appreciate the datefagging for what it is. It's us having fun and guessing. No one gives it much weight, unless it turns out to be true (or even maybe true), and then its about as exciting as a thing can be.