Go ahead and look up Hunter's live video interview for his book.
The problem with BlueAnons like yourself, is that you don't understand how evidence works. You are going to be waiting for the guilty party to make a live video confession that is covered by all of the mainstream media sources. Oh, but wait, Hunter actually DID "confess" during that interview for his book. Weird. It's almost like your research is really bad because you can't find anything...
I would highly recommend you take a course on Logic and Rhetoric. Maybe try some of those "logic puzzles" that are designed for gradeschoolers. Start with those ones, you know: if you have 3 apples, and Barney has 2 oranges, how many bananas does Jose have. Those kinds of things. You really need to be able to handle those kinds of things.
You clearly aren't at the level that you need to be in order to have discourse here. I really hope that you didn't pay too much for your education because it is lacking.
I find it absolutely HILARIOUS that you are attempting to question my research on timelines. I did my research. My knowledge is chronological. I am talking about when the Bidens were relevant to the discussion. You are trying to make the discussion happen BEFORE the Bidens were there. Which is completely false and a severe flaw in your logic.
I wish you luck in gaining the required intellectual abilities, but again, I highly doubt it...
And if you find yourself doubting our abilities on this forum (and 8kun, etc) look up the MIT study of when they "infiltrated a Q forum!" and found that our research and logic is unmatched. So... ya... good luck to you.
edit to add: Oh! also, read books on intrigue and military intelligence. Tom Clancy books would be a good place to start.
((commented here because the forum scolded me due to our discussion getting "too long"))
Go ahead and look up Hunter's live video interview for his book.
The problem with BlueAnons like yourself, is that you don't understand how evidence works. You are going to be waiting for the guilty party to make a live video confession that is covered by all of the mainstream media sources. Oh, but wait, Hunter actually DID "confess" during that interview for his book. Weird. It's almost like your research is really bad because you can't find anything...
I would highly recommend you take a course on Logic and Rhetoric. Maybe try some of those "logic puzzles" that are designed for gradeschoolers. Start with those ones, you know: if you have 3 apples, and Barney has 2 oranges, how many bananas does Jose have. Those kinds of things. You really need to be able to handle those kinds of things.
You clearly aren't at the level that you need to be in order to have discourse here. I really hope that you didn't pay too much for your education because it is lacking.
I find it absolutely HILARIOUS that you are attempting to question my research on timelines. I did my research. My knowledge is chronological. I am talking about when the Bidens were relevant to the discussion. You are trying to make the discussion happen BEFORE the Bidens were there. Which is completely false and a severe flaw in your logic.
I wish you luck in gaining the required intellectual abilities, but again, I highly doubt it...
And if you find yourself doubting our abilities on this forum (and 8kun, etc) look up the MIT study of when they "infiltrated a Q forum!" and found that our research and logic is unmatched. So... ya... good luck to you.
((commented here because the forum scolded me due to our discussion getting "too long"))