Don't insult us. If George News turns out to be legit and they are indeed "known in person when we (publicly) win", then you'd be eating your words at that time. I do not want be telling you, "See, I told you", because that means belittling your faith, which would have been different to mine at that instant.

For our following of George News is a matter of faith. We don't have the luxury of saying that they are absolutely real by direct, hard, provable evidence, only be circumstantial evidence and logical reasoning, and we have reasoned that the allegations raised in March were not sound enough to hold true.

If you mock that, then you may as well mock everyone else here who has faith and hope in that faith, because Q is like that, and 8kun, and Lin Wood, and Gen Flynn, and Sidney Powell, and Mike Lindell and the Audits, and President Trump, and his Administration, and the Military, and the Patriots worldwide, and Christ the Saviour. They are all faith-based. No one here has hard, direct, provable evidence that anything is actually happening, only circumstantial evidence masquerading as provable evidence. And yet we have the utmost faith that it is happening in the unseen background, because the bigger picture is saying that it is moving that-a-way.

Well, then, where's the truth in our faith in George News? They haven't given it to us yet but they have promised that they will yield that truth, and they haven't betrayed that promise so far, which is exactly why we're still watching. But you might ask, haven't they already betrayed us during that drama? Only if you thought that the allegations raised were sound and true, and those who still follow GN do not believe that those allegations were sound or true, and there are hundreds, perhaps thousands like me who think the same.

If I didn't think they were worth a damn following then I wouldn't spend hours piecing together the Chat Lines and giving them the proper context, with 23 compilations plus a few extras, and people here have requested that I do these and continue in spite of the doubts.

Don't insult us. If George News turns out to be legit and they are indeed "known in person when we (publicly) win", then you'd be eating your words at that time. I do not want be telling you, "See, I told you", because that means belittling your faith, which would have been different to mine at that instant.

For our following of George News is a matter of faith. We don't have the luxury of saying that they are absolutely real by direct, hard, provable evidence, only be circumstantial evidence and logical reasoning, and we have reasoned that the allegations raised in March were not sound enough to hold true.

If you mock that, then you may as well mock everyone else here who has faith and hope in that faith, because Q is like that, and 8kun, and Lin Wood, and Gen Flynn, and Sidney Powell, and Mike Lindell and the Audits, and President Trump, and his Administration, and the Military, and the Patriots worldwide, and Christ the Saviour. They are all faith-based. No one here has hard, direct, provable evidence that anything is actually happening, only circumstantial evidence masquerading as provable evidence. And yet we have the utmost faith that it is happening in the unseen background, because the bigger picture is saying that it is moving that-a-way.

Well, then, where's the truth in our faith in George News? They haven't given it to us yet but they have promised that they will yield that truth, and they haven't betrayed that promise so far, which is exactly why we're still watching. But you might ask, haven't they already betrayed us during that drama? Only if you thought that the allegations raised were sound and true, and those who still follow GN do not believe that those allegations were sound or true, and there are hundreds, perhaps thousands like me who think the same.

If I didn't think they were worth a damn following then I wouldn't spend hours piecing together the Chat Lines and giving them the proper context, with 23 compilations plus a few extras.