I agree completely. I was thinking that the only people who should be tagged are the taggers themselves. THEY are pro-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists (no need to modify this one), climate promoters, Trump nonsupporters, partisan supremacists, etc etc etc. We are "citizens" -- no other tag is necessary. I find it amusing in a sense, that they tag entire groups according to schools of thought, as if the tag adequately describes and defines them (us). Seems to me that this could ONLY work if ALL appropriate tags were used, in order to describe EVERYTHING the tagee is, or is what they purport he or she (or it) to be. So then I would be a non-pigmented American God-fearing Bible-thumping Trump-supporting gun-toting, non-vaxxing, mask refusing, staunchly and naturally non-toxic hetero, conservative supremacist, anti-lamestream media, DS/globalist lie rejecting, non-Faucian, constitutionalist PC-ignoring nationalist birther. I'm sure that I've missed a dozen or so . . .

I agree completely. I was thinking that the only people who should be tagged are the taggers themselves. THEY are pro-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists (no need to modify this one), climate promoters, Trump nonsupporters, partisan supremacists, etc etc etc. We are "citizens" -- no other tag is necessary. I find it amusing in a sense, that they tag entire groups according to schools of thought, as if tge tag adequately describes and defnes them (us). Seems to me that this could ONLY work if ALL apprpriate tags were used, in order to describe EVERYTHING the tagee is, or is what they purport he or she (or it) to be. So then I would be a non-pigmented American God-fearing Bible-thumping Trump-supporting gun-toting, non-vaxxing, mask refusing, semi-mysoginistic, hyper-hetero, conservative supremacist, anti-lamestream media, DS/globalist lie rejecting, non-Faucian, constitutionalist PC-ignoring nationalist birther. I'm sure that I've missed a dozen or so . . .