Observation. Local channels here are not covering President Trump's Legal Team, which is evidence of their bias by inequitable treatment of both sides. Good thing I stopped watching them and turned to OANN.

Trump's Legal Team doing a great job today! (Whew!)

Especially thought the one who presented the case regarding Trump's 1st amendment rights was great! He used the words of the Constitution <-- the document that the Globalists wish to erode. House Managers didn't cite case law, but Trump's Team did, along with the First Amendment itself.

The lawyer arguing against the House managers case re Trump's speech on 1-6 was also great, as I recall. He clearly showed the hypocrisy of every House manager and Senate members too. Each had video of them calling for "Fights". Were each of them "inciting violence?". It made me think of the scripture calling for those without fault to throw the first stone at the woman accused of adultery.

House Managers, Jamie Raskin, was attempting to rewrite a new impeachment doctrine...to erode the first amendment right of President Trump.

Interesting observation by the last lawyer to present before break--House of Representatives were effectively seeking to make President Trump an employee of the Legislative Branch. And I thought we have three separate but coequal branches.

No mention of Wood or Bond cases by House Mgrs, but Trump's Team clearly articulated their relevance. Why no mention by House guys? Because they wanted to ignore these rulings.

Q2: Does Trump's speech "deserve" protection under 1st Amendment?

Trump's Legal Team provided quotations that frankly, I didn't catch them. They quoted the Brandenburg v Ohio case as the landmark case regarding "inciting violence" . In it, a 3-pronged test was described that prevents speech from be accused of "inciting violence" unless...need the slide. Note taking not fast enough.

Hypocrisy was mentioned and illustrated again by all the Dem candidates for President using the word "Fight".

House Managers used manipulated videos.

President Trump used the word "Fight" 20x in his speech on 1-6, yet House Mgrs only chose 2 for their case against Trump. Why? Because only 2 served their motives.

Explained that, in context, the meaning of Fight in Trump's speech was to "Primary the ones that don't fight.". House Managers didn't use this one.

Some of us citizens know how corrupt the elections were...but Trump is right about No one calling it out before him.

" the Best Is Yet To Come. ". <-- I LOVE THIS!!

" who gets rid of "America First"? You may try, but you certainly don't tell anyone if you do."

The above are from Trump's speech on 1-6-2021.

All Democrat Presidential candidates have called for "fighting". HYPOCRISY. Were they referring to physical violence?

Ended with quote by Benjamin Franklin about FREEDOM of Speech.

More notes later in replies at next break.

Observation. Local channels here are not covering President Trump's Legal Team, which is evidence of their bias by inequitable treatment of both sides. Good thing I stopped watching them and turned to OANN. Trump's Legal Team doing a great job today! (Whew!) Especially thought the one who presented the case regarding Trump's 1st amendment rights was great! He used the words of the Constitution <-- the document that the Globalists wish to erode. House Managers didn't cite case law, but Trump's Team did, along with the First Amendment itself. The lawyer arguing against the House managers case re Trump's speech on 1-6 was also great, as I recall. He clearly showed the hypocrisy of every House manager and Senate members too. Each had video of them calling for "Fights". Were each of them "inciting violence?". It made me think of the scripture calling for those without fault to throw the first stone at the woman accused of adultery. House Managers, Jamie Raskin, was attempting to rewrite a new impeachment doctrine...to erode the first amendment right of President Trump. Interesting observation by the last lawyer to present before break--House of Representatives were effectively seeking to make President Trump an employee of the Legislative Branch. And I thought we have three separate but coequal branches. No mention of Wood or Bond cases by House Mgrs, but Trump's Team clearly articulated their relevance. Why no mention by House guys? Because they wanted to ignore these rulings. Q2: Does Trump's speech "deserve" protection under 1st Amendment? Trump's Legal Team provided quotations that frankly, I didn't catch them. They voted the Brandenburg v Ohio case as the landmark case regarding "inciting violence" . In it, a 3-pronged test was described that prevents speech from be accused of "inciting violence" unless...need the slide. Note taking not fast enough. Hypocrisy was mentioned and illustrated again by all the Dem candidates for President using the word "Fight". House Managers used manipulated videos. President Trump used the word "Fight" 20x in his speech on 1-6, yet House Mgrs only chose 2 for their case against Trump. Why? Because only 2 served their motives. Explained that, in context, the meaning of Fight in Trump's speech was to "Primary the ones that don't fight.". House Managers didn't use this one. Some of us citizens know how corrupt the elections were...but Trump is right about No one calling it out before him. " the Best Is Yet To Come. ". <-- I LOVE THIS!! " who gets rid of "America First"? You may try, but you certainly don't tell anyone if you do." The above are from Trump's speech on 1-6-2021. All Democrat Presidential candidates have called for "fighting". HYPOCRISY. We're they referring to physical violence? Ended with quote by Benjamin Franklin about FREEDOM of Speech. More notes later in replies at next break.

Observation. Local channels here are not covering President Trump's Legal Team, which is evidence of their boss by inequitable treatment of both sides. Good thing I stopped watching them and turned to OANN.

Trump's Legal Team doing a great job today! (Whew!)

Especially thought the one who presented the case regarding Trump's 1st amendment rights was great! He used the words of the Constitution <-- the document that the Globalists wish to erode.

House Managers didn't cite case law, but Trump's Team did, along with the First Amendment itself.

The lawyer arguing against the House managers case re Trump's speech on 1-6 was also great, as I recall. He clearly showed the hypocrisy of every House manager and Senate members too. Each had video of them calling for "Fights". We're each of them "inciting violence?". It made me think of the scripture calling for those without fault to throw the first stone at the woman accused of adultery.

House Managers, Jamie Raskin, was attempting to rewrite a new impeachment doctrine...to erode the first amendment right of President Trump.

Interesting observation by the last lawyer to present before break--House of Representatives were effectively seeking to make President Trump an employee of the Legislative Branch. And I thought we have three separate but coequal branches.

No mention of Wood or Bond cases by House Mgrs, but Trump's Team clearly articulated their relevance. Why no mention by House guys? Because they wanted to ignore these rulings.

Q2: Does Trump's speech "deserve" protection under 1st Amendment?

Trump's Legal Team provided quotations that frankly, I didn't catch them. They voted the Brandenburg v Ohio case as the landmark case regarding "inciting violence" . In it, a 3-pronged test was described that prevents speech from be accused of "inciting violence" unless...need the slide. Note taking not fast enough.

Hypocrisy was mentioned and illustrated again by all the Dem candidates for President using the word "Fight".

House Managers used manipulated videos.

President Trump used the word "Fight" 20x in his speech on 1-6, yet House Mgrs only chose 2 for their case against Trump. Why? Because only 2 served their motives.

Explained that, in context, the meaning of Fight in Trump's speech was to "Primary the ones that don't fight.". House Managers didn't use this one.

Some of us citizens know how corrupt the elections were...but Trump is right about No one calling it out before him.

" the Best Is Yet To Come. ". <-- I LOVE THIS!!

" who gets rid of "America First"? You may try, but you certainly don't tell anyone if you do."

The above are from Trump's speech on 1-6-2021.

All Democrat Presidential candidates have called for "fighting". HYPOCRISY. We're they referring to physical violence?

Ended with quote by Benjamin Franklin about FREEDOM of Speech.

More notes later in replies at next break.