I'm having a hard time gestating those freemason signs.

At any point those presenting them could have turned on the Cabal, and the old portraits can't reflect it.

There are old pictures of Trump with freemason ilk. The standing theory is the only reason he got as far as he did in the Primaries is because they thought he was arranging a hand off to Hillary for the win and then turned on her at the last moment, revealing he had been working with the US Military the whole time. That man has sacrificed a lot more than we could possibly imagine, I'd wager.

With Napoleon and Hitler, however, it seems they may have been installed by the Cabal but once they got the taste for power they decided to turn on them and go supernova in a challenge of supremacy.

Mind you, I don't think they did it for the right reasons. They wanted to be the only one in charge, nothing more. If absolute power corrupts absolutely, then those given power are fated to bite the hand that fed them.

Is it so unusual to think that the Cabal can have internal civil conflict for who is top dog?

Again, I don't think Napoleon was a good guy, but at the end there I don't think he was a bad guy either. Just another stooge who thought he could rule the world only to be dragged back by the debtor's chains of the past. He went about it the wrong way.

The only way to do it is to hand the reigns over to God. Every conqueror that has failed to do that has ultimately fallen. Every conqueror who has given his bounty over to God has produced great fruit, such as our Founding Fathers.

Napoleon and others thought they could fight fire with fire. They were gravely mistaken.

I'm having a hard time gestating those freemason signs.

At any point those presenting them could have turned on the Cabal, and the old portraits can't reflect it.

There are old pictures of Trump with freemason ilk. The standing theory is the only reason he got as far as he did in the Primaries is because they thought he was arranging a hand off to Hillary for the win and then turned on her at the last moment, revealing he had been working with the US Military the whole time. That man has sacrificed a lot more than we could possibly imagine, I'd wager.

With Napoleon and Hitler, however, it seems they may have been installed by the Cabal but once they got the taste for power they decided to turn on them and go supernova in a challenge of supremacy.

Mind you, I don't think they did it for the right reasons. They wanted to be the only one in charge, nothing more. If absolute power corrupts absolutely, then those given power are fated to bite the hand that fed them.

Is it so unusual to think that the Cabal can have internal civil conflict for who is top dog?

Again, I don't think Napoleon wasn't a good guy, but at the end there I don't think he was a bad guy either. Just another stooge who thought he could rule the world only to be dragged back by the debtor's chains of the past. He went about it the wrong way.

The only way to do it is to hand the reigns over to God. Every conqueror that has failed to do that has ultimately fallen. Every conqueror who has given his bounty over to God has produced great fruit, such as our Founding Fathers.

Napoleon and others thought they could fight fire with fire. They were gravely mistaken.