"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows. You invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. It's 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 or saying 1/cow or cow^-1 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows. you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 or saying 1/cow or cow^-1 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows (c). you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 or saying 1/cow or cow^-1 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows. you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows (c). you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows (c). you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means, it's implying a relationship and is conceptual without the related dimension.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows (c). you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow for the mathematical proof of this. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows. you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

For a stupid analogy to make inverse quantities make sense in reality without it meaning inverse reality exists:

Say you have 60 cows (c). you invert that to 1/60cow. Do inverse cows exist? The 1 on top technically has a measurement/dimension attached to it too, meaning inverse cows do not actually exist. its 1herd/60cow. So what would 1/60 mean in reality? 1 cow = 1/60 of the herd. Set 1herd/60cow = 1 and multiply both sides by cow. 1 herd per 60 cows or 60 cows per 1 herd. That's what inverse means.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.

Inverse in reality is explained as "x^-1" or "1/x" means "per x" or "x^-2" is "per x^2". It's conceptual as relating something to something else.

"two physical quantities that describe every wave are its frequency (1/seconds) and its wavevector (1/meters). This implies the existence of inverse space and inverse time, I wonder if our minds are able to access these inverse realities?"

No, this does not imply inverse time or space exists. Those are two ways of representing period (seconds/cycle) and wavelength (meters/cycle). And in reality the representation of frequency and vector are not single units as you stated, but cycle/second and cycle/meter, which implies how many cycles occur per second and how many cycles occur per meter. You could call them cycles or oscillations, whatever the completion of one cycle for whatever the physical body is doing repeatedly to be represented as waveform. There's different ways to represent relationships, you should understand this as a PhD candidate without assuming it means inverse space and time exists.