What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time (so far as we know, based on animal test trials in the search for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 that was ultimately abandoned because of test animal die-off). . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds), and given the many thousands (estimates range from 4,000 to 50,000) of people who have died FROM the vaccine.

Hopefully what he means is, the current experimental "vaccines" are no medical miracle. Rather, they are a strategic masterstroke, thwarting the DS/globalists' plans to develop a similarly deadly vaccine and get it approved in order to make it mandatory. At this point, it's a bit hard to see how the DS could have kept the "pandemic" terror going for two more years when it is so obviously not deadly for 99+% of the population. But DJT didn't know that at the time. The idiot forecaster named Neil Ferguson in England was predicting cv would cause 200 millions deaths, and managed to scare the shit out of DJT and Boris J with his wildly unreliable predictions. This was the guy who was caught breaking the social distancing rules in order to have trysts with his girlfriend (he was married at the time IIRC). Real class act. He eventually resigned bc of this: https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/05/uk/neil-ferguson-imperial-coronavirus-sage-gbr-intl/index.html

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time (so far as we know, based on animal test trials in the search for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 that was ultimately abandoned because of test animal die-off). . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds), and given the many thousands (estimates range from 4,000 to 50,000) of people who have died FROM the vaccine.

Hopefully what he means is, the current experimental "vaccines" are no medical miracle. Rather, they are a strategic masterstroke, thwarting the DS/globalists' plans to develop a similarly deadly vaccine and get it approved in order to make it mandatory. At this point, it's a bit hard to see how the DS could have kept the "pandemic" terror going for two more years when it is so obviously not deadly for 99+% of the population. But DJT didn't know that at the time. The idiot in England was forecasting 200 millions deaths, and I think managed to scare DJT and Boris J with his wildly unreliable predictions. This was the guy who was caught breaking the social distancing rules in order to have trysts with his girlfriend (he was married at the time IIRC). Real class act.

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time (so far as we know, based on animal test trials in the search for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 that was ultimately abandoned because of test animal die-off). . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds).

Hopefully what he means is, the current experimental "vaccines" are no medical miracle. Rather, they are a strategic masterstroke, thwarting the DS/globalists' plans to develop a similarly deadly vaccine and get it approved in order to make it mandatory. At this point, it's a bit hard to see how the DS could have kept the "pandemic" terror going for two more years when it is so obviously not deadly for 99+% of the population. But DJT didn't know that at the time. The idiot in England was forecasting 200 millions deaths, and I think managed to scare DJT and Boris J with his wildly unreliable predictions. This was the guy who was caught breaking the social distancing rules in order to have trysts with his girlfriend (he was married at the time IIRC). Real class act.

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time (so far as we know, based on animal test trials in the search for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 that was ultimately abandoned because of test animal die-off). . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds).

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time (so far as we know, based on animal test trials in the search for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 that was ultimately abandoned because of test animal die-off). . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds). We look forward to ultimately getting clarification on DJT's motives and meanings.

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time, so far as we know, based on animal tests for SARS-CoV-1 that were abandoned because of test animal die-off. . This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds). We look forward to ultimately getting clarification on DJT's motives and meanings.

What difference does it make? It's just putting forth a theory trying to explain DJT's support of an experimental "vaccine" that has the potential to kill millions over time. This theory has been posted, in slightly different forms, but asserting the same basic premises, a dozen times by now.

For many anons, the jury is still out on why Trump has trumpeted the vaccines, and we are waiting until much more is known. It makes sense that Trump would rush the vaccine production in order to ensure the result was an experimental (i.e., voluntary) vaccine, but it is baffling to some, including myself, why Trump has also specifically addressed the vaccines themselves and stated that they saved millions, when there is no evidence that millions of people who got the vaccine would otherwise have died of covid. Quite the opposite, given the CDC's own 99.9% survival rate (and that's without meds). We look forward to ultimately getting clarification on DJT's motives and meanings.