Not sure I get your point. That GP article links to McAffees tweet. The tweet is the original source of this photo.

All other copies online are taken from the original source (including the bbc link). If something was digitally altered in the original tweet source, than all other copies would also have it.

Also I gave it a look in photoshop (the original tweet version) on a big screen, and I can now see it hasnt been digitally altered.

Not sure I get your point. That GP article links to McAffees tweet. The tweet is the original source of this photo.

All other copies online are taken from the original source (including the bbc link). If something was digitally altered in the original tweet source, than all other copies will also have it.

Also I gave it a look in photoshop (the original tweet version) on a big screen, and I can now see it hasnt been digitally altered.

Not sure I get your point. That GP article links to McAffees tweet. The tweet is the original source of this photo.

All other copies online are taken from the original source (including the bbc link I found). If something was digitally altered in the original tweet source, than all other copies will also have it.

Also I gave it a look in photoshop (the original tweet version) on a big screen, and I can now see it hasnt been digitally altered.