Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour ______________ Sweet/Cute

         |       /

         |    / 

         | /

     Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

• Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

• Grace as attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I see grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

• Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.

If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.

Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour ______________ Sweet/Cute

         |       /

         |    / 

         | /

     Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

• Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

• Grace as attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

• Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.

If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.

Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour ____ Sweet/Cute \ / \ / Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

• Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

• Grace is attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

• Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.

If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.

Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour Sweet/Cute | _ _ _ |

         |       /

         |    / 

         | /

     Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

• Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

• Grace is attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

• Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.

If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.

Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour_ _ _ Sweet/Cute

         |     /

         |   / 

         | /

     Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

• Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

• Grace is attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

• Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.

If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.