Edit: Private School, apparently, but most of my points still stand.

So she and every taxpayer pays for these schools only for them to kick her kids out over criticisms she has over their curriculum? If anything, it's them who should be kicked out. People need to start remembering who actually owns these schools: the people. If someone is dissatisfied with their service in any other industry, they can just stop paying for it.

Why are the people indebted to pay a bunch of public servants to spend even more of the peoples' money, even for stuff they never wanted in the first place? And without an audit to ensure it's money well spent? Why are the servants paid more than many if not most of their constituents to handle money that isn't theirs' to spend?

A public servant is meant to serve, not be served. I think the people oughta remember that the next time they file their taxes.

So she and every taxpayer pays for these schools only for them to kick her kids out over criticisms she has over their curriculum? If anything, it's them who should be kicked out. People need to start remembering who actually owns these schools: the people. If someone is dissatisfied with their service in any other industry, they can just stop paying for it.

Why are the people indebted to pay a bunch of public servants to spend even more of the peoples' money, even for stuff they never wanted in the first place? And without an audit to ensure it's money well spent? Why are the servants paid more than many if not most of their constituents to handle money that isn't theirs' to spend?

A public servant is meant to serve, not be served. I think the people oughta remember that the next time they file their taxes.