Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529

You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion.

This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.

It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”

When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene derivatives, which may include oxidized graphene. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using, and would not commit to that conclusion.

I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.

The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.

This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.

You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.

Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529

You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion.

This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.

It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”

When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene derivatives, which may include oxidized graphene. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using.

I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.

The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.

This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.

You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.

Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529

You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion.

This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.

It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”

When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene oxide. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using.

I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.

The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.

This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.

You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.

Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529

You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion of Ruby.

This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.

It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”

When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene oxide. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using.

I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.

The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.

This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.

You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.