Wherever she is getting that information, it’s not in the report she’s citing. They specifically said they had no idea where the bottle came from and could not confirm what was in it, except that it may have had a graphene derivative in it. It makes no claims about Pfizer, the vaccine, or anything else like that.

They couldn’t even confirm that it was the vaccine, which is why they don’t call it one in the report.

People can say whatever they want in an interview. Research means looking at the data, and the data they gave us doesn’t support the claims they’re making. If they want to produce new data, then we can continue researching.

Wherever she is getting that information, it’s not in the report she’s citing. They specifically said they had no idea where the bottle came from and could not confirm what was in it, except that it may have had a graphene derivative in it. It makes no claims about Pfizer, the vaccine, or anything else like that.

People can say whatever they want in an interview. Research means looking at the data, and the data they gave us doesn’t support the claims they’re making. If they want to produce new data, then we can continue researching.

Wherever she is getting that information, it’s not in the report she’s citing. They specifically said they had no idea where the bottle came from and could not confirm what was in it, except that it may have had a graphene derivative in it. It makes no claims about Pfizer, the vaccine, or anything else like that.

People can say whatever they want in an interview. Research means looking at the data, and the data doesn’t support the claims they’re making. If they want to produce new data, then we can continue researching.