I am reading every word you say and understanding it.

But I don’t think you’re understanding me.

You’re telling me what you believe to be true, because you accept Q is who he claims to be.

What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.

I understand that IF I believe Q is doing these things, then this is how I would interpret Q’s posts.

But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that he claims he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.

Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.

If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.

Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?

I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s real. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.

I am reading every word you say and understanding it.

But I don’t think you’re understanding me.

You’re telling me what you believe to be true.

What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.

I understand that IF you believe Q is doing these things, then this is how you would interpret Q’s posts.

But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that you believe he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.

Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.

If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.

Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?

I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s credible. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.

I am reading every word you say and understanding it.

But I don’t think you’re understanding me.

You’re telling me what you believe to be true.

What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.

I understand that IF you believe Q is doing these things, then this is how you would interpret Q’s posts.

But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that you believe he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.

Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.

If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.

Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?

I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s credible. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.

I am reading every word you say and understanding it.

But I don’t think you’re understanding me.

You’re telling me what you believe to be true.

What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.

I understand that IF you believe Q is doing these things, then this is how you would interpret Q’s posts.

But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that you believe he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.

Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.

If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.

Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?

I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s real. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.

I am reading every word you say and understanding it.

But I don’t think you’re understanding me.

You’re telling me what you believe to be true.

What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.

I understand that IF you believe Q is doing these things, then this is how you would interpret Q’s posts.

But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that you believe he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.

Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.

If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.

Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?