Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election law. If you try to play nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.

Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election law. If you try to place nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.

Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially elections law. If you try to place nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.

Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. He’s on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election laws. The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.