Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher for releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice - voice of teacher or voices of children) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to only lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where and using it by God only knows who for God only know what purpose... And well - even releasing it to parents in a form of voice could be risky. Technology is developing,we know about deep fake right ?
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class. Ask your children.Simply
I think those idea of recording it in video or sound is not worth it.Not worth it.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher for releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice - voice of teacher or voices of children) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to only lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where and using it by God only knows who for God only know what purpose... And well - even releasing it to parents in a form of voice could be risky. Technology is developing,we know about deep fake right ?
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher for releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice - voice of teacher or voices of children) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to only lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where and using it by God only knows who for God only know what purpose...
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class. GO TO CLASS simply.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher for releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice - voice of teacher or voices of children) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to only lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where and using it by God only knows who for God only know what purpose...
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to only lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where and using it by God only knows who for God only know what purpose...
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Nice for lawyers,but not so fine I guess. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where...
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. But you see how complicated it would become. Despite those complications being ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to lower disadvantages and probability of leaking it God only know where...
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum.'
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum.'
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Endorsing more surveillance is not a way.Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum.'
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum.'
However u/Quanut - you are mainly right,right and right. Easy and safer solution is simple:
Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Only physical acces - archive server not connected to internet. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Cameras or microphones only on cables - no wifi. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
Recording things happening in class after lessons forbidden. Releasing record not from lesson unless crime (like for example rape) is committed shall be a crime, as it would be/or : is - criminal intrusion into privacy of the teacher.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be strongly against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Decrypted version shall be removed after hearing,encrypted version shall not be kept on the same device like the key. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice) and the same for unresponsively keeping it on hard drive in decrypted version or possible to decrypt by the hacker (key+encrypted on 1 device online) - but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance. (Unfortunately bad side of democracy is some not wise ideas could be allowed by majority)
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing on demand - in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be against streaming it.
Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home then and only then. Fines for hearing it in work or copying into internet (or even possibility to be sued by teacher - releasing personal biometric data in form of human voice),but possible to be proof in court if you want to sue school.
If parents should get such data - that would be maximum. Wanna see teacher and how lesson is done in real time ? Go to class.
Definitely - NOT. And I guess after reading those your opinion above it is sarcasm.
The only thing to discuss here would be maybe access to parents. Anything more is not acceptable. Anything more would be clearly unlawful surveillance.
Personally I would be rather supporting sound being available to parent's auditing in encrypted version and key given to parents at the beginning of school year... And I would rather be against streaming it. Just keep it offline,and allow only to be copied by parent on pendrive or cd/dvd in encrypted version. Decryption and hearing in home.