I think you should add the very simple fact that audits aren't simple recounts. If the votes are counterfeit, counting the same votes again isn't proving or disproving anything. If the fraudulent ones were counted, wtf does counting them again solve? Do they think auditting companies is as simple as asking them to calculate everything and see if all the ones were carried over? No, lmao.

An ice cream analogy for a recount would be asking the ice cream store owner where he bought his ingredients from, then going to the manufacturers and asking them if they've had any similar issues.

An audit would be actively testing the ingredients both at the manufacturer and the ice cream store for anything sus (and I don't mean pcr tests, cuz with a high enough cycle, you could test AOC for any signs of intelligence and actually test positive) and then reporting your findings.

I think you should add the very simple fact that audits aren't simple recounts. If the votes are counterfeit, counting the same votes again isn't proving or disproving anything. You need more than a simple calculator. That's literally why people audit companies.

An ice cream analogy for a recount would be asking the ice cream store owner where he bought his ingredients from, then going to the manufacturers and asking them if they've had any similar issues.

An audit would be actively testing the ingredients both at the manufacturer and the ice cream store for anything sus (and I don't mean pcr tests, cuz with a high enough cycle, you could test AOC for any signs of intelligence and actually test positive) and then reporting your findings.