Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law.

One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Formatting

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

“This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law". “One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.”

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

“This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law". “One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.”

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

“This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law". “One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.”

3 years ago
1 score