I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does. Its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and and potentially destroying a trillion dollar industry while asking even more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment, as this could destroy the trillion dollar industry. The bottom line is the bottom line. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and asking more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?

I try not to get too tinfoily when speaking to normies (I used to be one) so I kind of just say crap like, uhh, this sounds like they're covering up for an ineffective treatment. If people who got jabbed are experiencing the brunt of it, instead of telling people to hold off until they get the numbers right, why are they risking the very real possibility of the science on an experi mental treatment being wrong and asking more people to take it?

If everybody takes it, we won't know if there actually is a VARlANTTHAT is worse than the OG which all prior science indicates can't be true as our immune systems adapt faster than a virus' IethaIity does, as its primary motive is to reproduce, not to kiII as it spreads less than if it were to be relatively mundane, like every other virus in history. The flu got more prolific, not more scary. Same deal with herpes and what not.

If they (finally) bring up the fact that it has synthetic inserts, bring up all the emails that indicate that the very people pushing for the jab had money on this all along. They were the ones funding it. Why would I ever trust them?