My weekend is busier than I thought, but I owe you a briefish response on this. I want to divide it into two main points: codes and the deltas.

CODES

What is the theory on Q using codes? Who is he protecting the information supposedly encoded inside from?

The Deep State? Because that's a non-answer for me. If a code can be broken here, it can be broken on the back of a napkin at the NSA. I have not seen a single example of math competency here that would be capable of defeating an encryption that would confound the brightest mathematical minds on the planet, and those people work for the NSA.

If you want to prove me wrong, however, you can decrypt the Kryptos sculpture that hangs out in front of the CIA building. Only three of the four stones have been solved, which means you can check your work if you do it from scratch, and show that you're a better codebreaker than the people who supposedly work for the Deep State.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptos

So if the code isn't designed to protect from the Deep State, who then? The normies? That doesn't really align with the concept of a Great Awakening, considering the whole point of why people are supposedly dying from the vaccine and losing their jobs and such is because we have to wait for normies to wake up. We're sacrificing people until the normies decide to do code-breaking for no apparent reason?

The ONLY parsimonious theory I can find here is that the codes aren't really there to protect the info from anyone. They're just a game. Because Q is a game. Q has you solving codes so that you feel like you're in a spy movie, because this whole thing is designed to feel like a movie. And as long as you're deciphering codes, you feel invested in the theory.

The codes are there for fun, because Q is doing this for fun. I can't figure out any actual security reason for codes that you guys are actually capable of deciphering, because I can promise you that no actual modern encryption intended to actually protect information is done using math that anyone here is likely to have even heard of, let alone worked with.

Do you have an idea that makes more sense that that?

DELTAS

This is just confirmation bias manifest, and importantly, it's because you guys don't keep track of your failures. At all.

Can you tell me how many different events people have seen and said, "Watch the water"? Off the top of my head, I can think of Charles Flynn, the Evergiven, Chinese moves in Taiwan, the hospital ships off the coast during COVID, and even the Texas ice storm ("ice is a form of water" -GAW).

And every time nothing happened with those, you guys completely forgot that you had ever considered these events a "victory" for Q. You still have the tally in your head, but you don't consider how many times your interpretations have failed, so it feels like nothing but winning.

This is compounded by the fact that you (and Q) labeled just about every single day, every single weekend, every single upcoming event as being potentially important. And then when something happens and you can squint your way through to seeing it as a victory, you add it to the "proof" pile.

How did Q manage to post on the exact minute McCain's death was mentioned? Because Q is a news junkie. Q also posted multiple times a day. He posted the exact minute McCain's death was announced? Announced by who? Lots of people announced it on a variety of different minutes. If he saw it on CNN in one tab and thirty seconds later posts a thing on 8kun in another tab, and the Fox announces the death a minute later, congratulations. You have a Q drop capable of convincing people you’re a high-level intelligence agent.

A 20 year old nobody could absolutely say, "Clinton will be indicted", then be very wrong about that, but also have a following loyal enough to shoehorn in a Saudi connection and call it a victory. That's how literally all successful psychics work. It's related to cold reading, a strategy that involves convincing your audience of loyal believers to make connections for you, and then you take credit for those connections.

I know a 20 year old nobody could do that, because I enjoyed doing magic tricks as 10 year old nobody and was doing exactly that sort of mentalism for fun. I could absolutely, 100% convince people that I could read their mind just by having them do the work for me. I couldn't be wrong, because the people watching the trick WANTED me to succeed, and therefore helped me do it.

Deltas have always been utterly unconvincing to me for that reason. It makes Q's predictions non-falsifiable, and essentially every argument you use are the same ones that people use to try to scientifically prove the influence of God. You simply seek out events that look like victories, and interpret defeats in ways that look like victories.

Like I said, confirmation bias. Deltas are the worst offenders of this, as if it's impossible that Q, a prolific poster probably somewhere in an American time zone, could not possibly by sheer volume accidentally post at the same time as some big event. As if it's impossible that Q making CONSTANT promises about a big upcoming plan would at some point line up with some event in another country that you guys would choose to interpret as a victory.

This is why I have such a hard time following people down the delta rabbit hole. Because the victories require mental gymnastics, and you guys simply aren't keeping a running tally of how many times an event either fell apart for you, or faded away and memory-holed by a community that was SURE the Evergiven was going to be full of nukes or children or whatever.

My weekend is busier than I thought, but I owe you a briefish response on this. I want to divide it into two main points: codes and the deltas.

CODES

What is the theory on Q using codes? Who is he protecting the information supposedly encoded inside from?

The Deep State? Because that's a non-answer for me. If a code can be broken here, it can be broken on the back of a napkin at the NSA. I have not seen a single example of math competency here that would be capable of defeating an encryption that would confound the brightest mathematical minds on the planet, and those people work for the NSA.

If you want to prove me wrong, however, you can decrypt the Kryptos sculpture that hangs out in front of the CIA building. Only three of the four stones have been solved, which means you can check your work if you do it from scratch, and show that you're a better codebreaker than the people who supposedly work for the Deep State.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptos

So if the code isn't designed to protect from the Deep State, who then? The normies? That doesn't really align with the concept of a Great Awakening, considering the whole point of why people are supposedly dying from the vaccine and losing their jobs and such is because we have to wait for normies to wake up. We're sacrificing people until the normies decide to do code-breaking for no apparent reason?

The ONLY parsimonious theory I can find here is that the codes aren't really there to protect the info from anyone. They're just a game. Because Q is a game. Q has you solving codes so that you feel like you're in a spy movie, because this whole thing is designed to feel like a movie. And as long as you're deciphering codes, you feel invested in the theory.

The codes are there for fun, because Q is doing this for fun. I can't figure out any actual security reason for codes that you guys are actually capable of deciphering, because I can promise you that no actual modern encryption intended to actually protect information is done using math that anyone here is likely to have even heard of, let alone worked with.

Do you have an idea that makes more sense that that?

DELTAS

This is just confirmation bias manifest, and importantly, it's because you guys don't keep track of your failures. At all.

Can you tell me how many different events people have seen and said, "Watch the water"? Off the top of my head, I can think of Charles Flynn, the Evergiven, Chinese moves in Taiwan, the hospital ships off the coast during COVID, and even the Texas ice storm ("ice is a form of water" -GAW).

And every time nothing happened with those, you guys completely forgot that you had ever considered these events a "victory" for Q. You still have the tally in your head, but you don't consider how many times your interpretations have failed, so it feels like nothing but winning.

This is compounded by the fact that you (and Q) labeled just about every single day, every single weekend, every single upcoming event as being potentially important. And then when something happens and you can squint your way through to seeing it as a victory, you add it to the "proof" pile.

How did Q manage to post on the exact minute McCain's death was mentioned? Because Q is a news junkie. Q also posted multiple times a day. He posted the exact minute McCain's death was announced? Announced by who? Lots of people announced it on a variety of different minutes.

A 20 year old nobody could absolutely say, "Clinton will be indicted", then be very wrong about that, but also have a following loyal enough to shoehorn in a Saudi connection and call it a victory. That's how literally all successful psychics work. It's related to cold reading, a strategy that involves convincing your audience of loyal believers to make connections for you, and then you take credit for those connections.

I know a 20 year old nobody could do that, because I enjoyed doing magic tricks as 10 year old nobody and was doing exactly that sort of mentalism for fun. I could absolutely, 100% convince people that I could read their mind just by having them do the work for me. I couldn't be wrong, because the people watching the trick WANTED me to succeed, and therefore helped me do it.

Deltas have always been utterly unconvincing to me for that reason. It makes Q's predictions non-falsifiable, and essentially every argument you use are the same ones that people use to try to scientifically prove the influence of God. You simply seek out events that look like victories, and interpret defeats in ways that look like victories.

Like I said, confirmation bias. Deltas are the worst offenders of this, as if it's impossible that Q, a prolific poster probably somewhere in an American time zone, could not possibly by sheer volume accidentally post at the same time as some big event. As if it's impossible that Q making CONSTANT promises about a big upcoming plan would at some point line up with some event in another country that you guys would choose to interpret as a victory.

This is why I have such a hard time following people down the delta rabbit hole. Because the victories require mental gymnastics, and you guys simply aren't keeping a running tally of how many times an event either fell apart for you, or faded away and memory-holed by a community that was SURE the Evergiven was going to be full of nukes or children or whatever.