I'm not necessarily claiming that. Though I think you're right that I perhaps should have clarified my words a little better to ensure I didn't imply that. It's easier to take one leap at a time, rather than two. I personally do not believe in the existence of viruses. I did not start out years ago by questioning all virus theory. I started with just HIV, reading Peter Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then looking into a host of other virues whose existence was dismantled by the phenomenal book "Virus Mania" (3rd edition). Finally, the corona fraud. Eventually, one is able to generalize the fraud of individual viruses to the field and its virus theory as a whole. There is not one methodologically sound, reproducible study that has ever isolated, photographed, and/or genetically characterized a virus, nor proven causation for an illness. Not . . . one. And the original studies that set the standards for isolation and characterization of viruses are a mere mockery of logic and the scientific method. I recommend you start following Andrew Kaufman's videos in order to introduce you to this deeper dive down the rabbit hole.

I'm not necessarily claiming that. Though I think you're right that I perhaps should have clarified my words a little better to ensure I didn't imply that. It's easier to take one leap at a time, rather than two. I personally do not believe in the existence of viruses. I did not start out years ago by questioning all virus theory. I started with just HIV, reading Peter Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then a host of others whose existence was dismantled by the phenomenal book "Virus Mania" (3rd edition). Finally, the corona fraud. Eventually, one is able to generalize the fraud of individual viruses to the field and its virus theory as a whole. There is not one methodologically sound, reproducible study that has ever isolated, photographed, and/or genetically characterized a virus, nor proven causation for an illness. Not . . . one. And the original studies that set the standards for isolation and characterization of viruses are a mere mockery of logic and the scientific method. I recommend you start following Andrew Kaufman's videos in order to introduce you to this deeper dive down the rabbit hole.

I'm not necessarily claiming that. Though I think you're right that I perhaps should have clarified my words a little better to ensure I didn't imply that. It's easier to take one leap at a time, rather than two. I personally do not believe in the existence of viruses. I did not start out years ago by questioning all virus theory. I started with just HIV, reading Peter Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then a host of others whose existence was dismantled by the phenomenal book "Virus Mania" (3rd edition). Finally, the corona fraud. Eventually, one is able to generalize the fraud of individual viruses to the field and its virus theory as a whole. There is not one methodologically sound, reproducible study that has ever isolated, photographed, and/or genetically characterized a virus, nor proven causation for an illness. Not . . . one. I recommend you start following Andrew Kaufman's videos in order to introduce you to this deeper dive down the rabbit hole.