Exactly this. What is this compared to baseline? That's a problem that I've seen on these .win sites... Taking a piece of data and flimsily using it to support their narrative. "See, look at all these deaths from the vaccine!" There is bad information on both sides, but those that really need to be vaccinated, the high risk populations, should probably be getting the vaccine. Old people and sick people unfortunately die on the daily. But without comparison to the expected baseline mortality rates, this is kind of useless data.

Young and healthy people under 50? That should be up to the individual to decide, but the more I read, and the more censoring I see happening to reliable and credentialed doctors and scientists, the more uneasy this all makes me feel. Especially given everything that I've read on Ivermectin and the meta-analysis that the flccc.net group has done.

Exactly this. What is this compared to baseline? That's a problem that I've seen on these .win sites... Taking a piece of data and flimsily using it to support their narrative. "See, look at all these deaths from the vaccine!" There is bad information on both sides, but those that really need to be vaccinated, the high risk populations, should probably be getting the vaccine. Old people and sick people unfortunately die on the daily. But without comparison to the expected baseline mortality rates, this is kind of useless data.

Young and healthy people under 50? That should be up to the individual to decide, but the more I read, and the more censoring I see occur to reliable and credentialed doctors and scientists, the more uneasy this all makes me feel. Especially given everything that I've read on Ivermectin and the meta-analysis that the flccc.net group has done.