I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big for its own sake, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush Sr.? Conservatives. And don't forget that Ross Perot drew votes from both Republicans and Democrats, at a ratio of roughly 3:2. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big for its own sake, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush Sr.? Conservatives. And don't forget that Ross Perot drew votes from both Republicans and Democrats, at a ratio of roughly 3:2. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big for its own sake, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for providing things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now way too many conservatives fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has now totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a resurgence as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. Nobody can argue that we should never organize as a community for things that benefit all. The real issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals for usurpation of power, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for thing that benefit all, the issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for thing that benefit all, the issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically, populism and the importance of national health have found advocacy in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advanced the cause of a centralized government and economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be utilities or police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for thing that benefit all, the issue is that when we do organize, such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible, which will always mean placing it in the most local jurisdiction possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush, Jr. over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically populism and the importance of national health have taken part in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advocated a centralized government a economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be water utilities or organizing police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for the good of all, the issue is that when we do such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the power of making wealth. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically populism and the importance of national health have taken part in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advocated a centralized government a economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be water utilities or organizing police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for the good of all, the issue is that when we do such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically populism and the importance of national health have taken part in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advocated a centralized government a economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be water utilities or organizing police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for the good of all, the issue is that when we do such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible.

I could believe that conservatives were less responsible than liberals, if conservatives had historically criticized big business and big corporations as much as they criticize big governments. But they didn't, and even now they fail to recognize that big government and big corporations go hand in hand, neither does nor can exist without the other. They are the necessary two sides of one phenomenon, which might be called centralization. One centralizes the power of making law while the other centralizes the economy. Back in 1999 at the WTO protests in Seattle, liberals were way more involved than conservatives in that push and were way more aware and vocal about what was going on with the advancement of Globalism. Conservatives were still dragging their knuckles and following Bush over the cliff of the 9/11 false flag fraud and the manipulation of it for building up the national security police state. Conservatives, by far more than liberals, sent their sons to die in the desert, not for a government that had gotten too big, but for a government that had been expanded, centralized and utterly taken over by big corporations and Wall Street. Under which president did Wall Street deindustrialize the nation, financialize the economy, and consolidate corporations into multinational, global behemoths? Ronald Reagan, the icon of conservatives even today. Who failed to embrace Pat Buchanan's early nationalist economic and cultural values and instead fell for the neocon NWO captain Bush, Sr.? Conservatives. Although I admit that the left has totally collapsed and devolved into a mutant shadow of its former self, while the right is experiencing a return as the vanguard of common sense and national survival, historically populism and the importance of national health have taken part in both left and right political movements. The divide is not between liberal and conservative, it is between centralized control and non-centralized control. Liberals have often been the champions of a decentralized government and economy, and conservatives have often advocated a centralized government a economy. Conservatives don't realize that anything good that happens in local government, whether it be water utilities or organizing police or strong but locally empowered school districts, is a form of socialism. The issue is not that we should never organize as a community for the good of all, the issue is that when we do such organized power should be subject to the most effective accountability to the citizenry as possible.