Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Will the overall total ballot count match what was originally reported by the AZ SoS and the county BofE's? Most likely. And that's the rub. It'll match almost exactly with the previous counts done, but, as with all data sets, the "proof is in the pudding," so to speak.

The true analysis will most likely show, once every ballot is sorted into it's correct pile, that there is a high amount of discrepancy between the true, LEGAL votes and the illegal and fraudulent CCP non-water marked fakes, the duplicate votes, the votes by any unregistered "voters," and votes from the deceased.

This article seems to be an attempt by another MSM leaning news agency to discredit and "debunk" whatever the audit eventually uncovers. [they] can and will most likely point to this article and others like it later on in the discredit/debunk attempts. Just like they have with the other MSM outlets saying the SoS, Dems/RINOs, et al. are correct and the original counts are accurate.

Even without waiting the obligatory 48 hrs, one should be able to see this part of [their] plans. It's a tried and true method of how [they] muddy the waters of public perception in order to paint the "official" narrative on any given subject.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Will the overall total ballot count match what was originally reported by the AZ SoS and the county BofE's? Most likely. And that's the rub. It'll make ch almost exactly with the previous counts done, but, as with all data sets, the p"roof is in the pudding," so to speak. The true analysis will show that there is a high amount of discrepancy between the true, LEGAL votes and the fraudulent votes.

This article seems to be an attempt by another MSM leaning news agency to discredit and "debunk" whatever the audit shows. [they] can and will most likely point to this article and others like it later on in the discredit/debunk attempts. Just like they have with the other MSM outlets saying the SoS, Dems/RINOs, et al. are correct and the original counts are accurate.

Even without waiting the obligatory 48 hrs, one should be able to see this part of [their] plans. It's a tried and true method of how [they] muddy the waters of public perception in order to paint the "official" narrative on any given subject.

3 years ago
1 score