Because THEY HAVE NO AGENDA BUT THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH. Right?

Even in cases where this is true, every scientist worthy of the title understands that no word or work ever produced by them is a statement of truth. It is at best a presentation of evidence that suggests a step closer to the truth than the body of human knowledge was before that work.

In other words, even if a scientist pursues only truth in earnest, the scientific process does not allow for it to ever reach truth, only iteratively move closer to it.

In addition, any such statement of findings must stand up to debate for all time to be determined as even reaching the status of useful in the decision making process.

So "scientific advise" without debate is nothing more than a decree of personal dogmatic interpretation, having completely divorced itself from the scientific process.

Because THEY HAVE NO AGENDA BUT THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH. Right?

Even in cases where this is true, every scientist worthy of the title understands that no word or work ever produced by them is a statement of truth. It is at best a presentation of evidence that suggests a step closer to the truth than the body of human knowledge was before that work.

In other words, even if a scientist pursues only truth in earnest, the scientific process does not allow for it to ever reach truth, only iteratively move closer to it.

In addition, any such statement of findings must stand up to debate for all time to be determined as even reaching the status of useful in the decision making process.

So "scientific advise" without debate is nothing more than a decree of personal dogma, having completely divorced itself from the scientific process.

Because THEY HAVE NO AGENDA BUT THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH. Right?

Even in cases where this is true, every scientist worthy of the title understands that no word or work ever produced by them is a statement of truth. It is at best a presentation of evidence that suggests a step closer to the truth than the body of human knowledge was before that work.

In other words, even if a scientist pursues only truth in earnest, the scientific process does not allow for it to ever reach truth, only iteratively move closer to it.