Revisions | The Great Awakening - Where We Go Qne, We Go All!

Reason: None provided.

Prepare a document full of memes and articles:

Memes

https://i.imgur.com/YHt7Kh8.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/n3CY01b/Ed-Ooz-YNWk-AATY-v.jpg

Doctor Says Vaccine Dangerous:

https://www.northsidesun.com/columns-local-news-opinion/opinion-covid-vaccine-not-safe#sthash.kPdzYvvu.dpbs

Questionable padded Covid death rate statistics include people who died 'with' Covid and not 'of' Covid

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/investigations/questions-over-the-accuracy-of-how-the-state-tracks-covid-deaths/283-0b1b7b6c-695e-4313-92cf-a4cfd7510721

So what does that policy mean in practice? We asked Modie about a hypothetical case where someone died from a motorcycle crash and also had COVID-19. Would that be counted as a COVID-19 death?

“It would be,” Modie explained. “But I must go back to the point about how we used this data, which is to help us track how COVID-19 is spread in the community.”

Same method in Australia: https://theconversation.com/died-from-or-died-with-covid-19-we-need-a-transparent-approach-to-counting-coronavirus-deaths-145438

Illinois admits the same method: https://week.com/2020/04/20/idph-director-explains-how-covid-deaths-are-classified/

Dr. Birx admits the method: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/04/08/dr_birx_unlike_some_countries_if_someone_dies_with_covid-19_we_are_counting_that_as_a_covid-19_death.html

Did they do the same for flu in years past? If someone died of a motorcycle accident with symptomatic or asymptomatic flu would they be recorded as a flu death?

No.

Lockdown itself causes excess deaths:

Muh 'excess death counts' muddied by the fact that the lockdown itself caused excess deaths. People were afraid of going to the hospital, delaying treatment for serious issues and causing excess deaths:

https://www.kxl.com/study-shows-increase-in-non-covid-deaths-during-pandemic/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778361

Drug and vaccine creation usually takes long period of time, pushed out to the public in months:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK24645/

Drug Animal Testing:

"This stage of safety testing usually takes about 4 years. Drug companies test for mutagenicity (ability to cause genetic changes) and carcinogenicity (ability to cause cancer). The drugs are also tested to confirm that they do not cause infertility (inability to have children) or birth defects. This stage of safety testing takes many years, because it may take a long period of time for animals to develop cancer or infertility as a result of a toxic drug."

It takes years for a reason.

The whole process of human drug testing typically takes a long time:

"Clinical testing is complex and time-consuming, averaging 14 years to complete Phase I through III testing to gain FDA approval."

Typical vaccine development:

https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/vaccine-development-testing-and-regulation

"Vaccine development is a long, complex process, often lasting 10-15 years and involving a combination of public and private involvement."

So it takes 10 to 15 years normally. Why is that?

Maybe because they need time to test the long term effects and don't like going around giving people untested things that were cooked up. And in this case the type of vaccine is totally new and permanently changes your cells to produce things it doesn't normally produce. Let's just give it to everyone, no long term testing needed on that. And give it to children too now. Great idea.

3 years ago

1 score

Reason: Original